Without vairagya, one cannot identify the true nature of objects. Huh? If there is no vairagya, one cannot identify the true nature of objects. It is not like that. That if there is no vairagya, one cannot identify objects. Someone comes and says, "Jay Swaminarayan," and shakes hands. Shakes hands and smiles, and then hits you twice from behind. Then? Then what would you think of him? You shake hands and walk away, and he hits you twice from behind, then? One would consider him an enemy. So, it is not like vairagya comes first and then identification. First comes identification. And then there is a sequence. First, one practices dharma dharma 1) Universal law or principle that 'sustains' or 'upholds' the entire world. Righteousness, morality, religion, Tap to open in glossary → , which purifies the antahkaran. And when it is purified, one gains knowledge. And when one gains knowledge, one develops vairagya. And after developing vairagya, one develops bhakti bhakti Devotion to Bhagvãn. One of the four attributes of ekãntik dharma. There are nine types of bhakti: Tap to open in glossary → . When one detaches from the world, this is said to be the natural sequence. Its natural sequence is said to be like this. If he is attached to this world, how can he perform bhakti bhakti Devotion to Bhagvãn. One of the four attributes of ekãntik dharma. There are nine types of bhakti: Tap to open in glossary → of God? It won't happen easily. Then some might do a little, and some might not. Along with that, this bhakti bhakti Devotion to Bhagvãn. One of the four attributes of ekãntik dharma. There are nine types of bhakti: Tap to open in glossary → also happens, and that bhakti bhakti Devotion to Bhagvãn. One of the four attributes of ekãntik dharma. There are nine types of bhakti: Tap to open in glossary → also happens. So, practicing rules purifies one's antahkaran. "Ahar shuddho sattva shuddhi." Sattva means antahkaran. If one consumes food according to dharma dharma 1) Universal law or principle that 'sustains' or 'upholds' the entire world. Righteousness, morality, religion, Tap to open in glossary → and rules, then his antahkaran becomes pure. And if the antahkaran becomes pure, then one gains knowledge. Then the object appears as it is. And if it appears as it is, then what is good appears good, and what is bad appears bad. So, that is called vivek vivek Wisdom. Discretion. Carefulness. Good judgment. Tap to open in glossary → . And when vivek vivek Wisdom. Discretion. Carefulness. Good judgment. Tap to open in glossary → is put into action, then it is called vairagya. That is vairagya. Often it appears that one's elements are identified. Or if the nature of the antahkaran is identified, then instead of vairagya, an inferiority complex or one falls into an inferiority complex. That can also happen, so why did he not develop vairagya? Falling into an inferiority complex means, who falls into an inferiority complex? Where does the inferiority complex reside? In body-consciousness. Huh? In body-consciousness. So, it resides in the intellect, meaning he did not identify his intellect. Whether my intellect is explaining the truth or falsehood to me, all these are mixed in it, right? So, we have identification, but it is just a brief flash. There is no real identification in it. From above, it appeared to us that this is wrong, this is right, and this is wrong, or this is good, and this is bad; only that much is visible. When there is a true identification down to the bottom, then it is called identification, right? Identification down to the bottom. In reality, what is called identification in the scriptures? "Vidvan vipashchit doshagnah." So, what does that mean? Vidvan means wise, knowledgeable. Vipashchit means wise, sensible. And then? Doshagnah. That is written in a very systematic order. Vidvan means he knows, and vipashchit means wisdom in it, meaning he applies vivek vivek Wisdom. Discretion. Carefulness. Good judgment. Tap to open in glossary → , and then? He sees flaws. When he sees flaws, then he is called wise. Why was it not said, "Vidvan vipashchit gunagnah"? Why was it not said like that? If flaws are seen, then virtues are seen on their own. It is true that a person's virtues and flaws are seen, but when there is proper knowledge of flaws, then it is called identification. So, when he gains knowledge of the flaws of the senses, then it is said that he has attained realization. Kapil Bhagwan was a realizer of elements, so what does that mean? Realizer of flaws. He knew their flaws as they are. Maharaj said that the wise one is called jitendriya (one who has conquered his senses). And the wise one also knows the five sensory objects and worldly things through these senses and antahkaran. And other ignorant souls also know through them. So, what is the difference between a wise one and an ignorant soul? The wise one knows his flaws. His flaws are deep He knows his flaws as they are. So, he strives to stay away from them, which is why he is called wise. And the ignorant soul jumps headfirst into them, which is why he is ignorant. He also enjoys sensory objects through the senses, and the other also enjoys sensory objects through the senses, but he knows their flaws as they are, which is why he is wise. He knows their virtues, which is why the other is ignorant. He knows the virtues of the world, which is why he is ignorant. And he knows the flaws of the world, which is why this one is wise. And that is why he is called jitendriya because of that. Just knowing this information does not make one wise. Google knows that, so Google should have great vairagya. So, it does not happen because of that. Intellect knows everything through intellect. Intellect is the platform for knowing. Huh? The soul knows everything through the medium of intellect. To know the intellect, the soul. The instrument is the soul. The soul has no other instrument. "To know the knowing of the intellect by the knowing of the soul," Maharaj has written this in the fourth Vachanamrut of Kariyani. So, the knowing that is in the intellect is the knowing in the soul. And the wrong work that the intellect does is done by the soul itself. If one believes so, then the kusang kusang The association of an evil person. Tap to open in glossary → residing within departs. Otherwise, it does not depart. Maharaj said so in the Vachanamrut. Only if the one who does wrong considers it his own fault, then only the kusang kusang The association of an evil person. Tap to open in glossary → within departs. If one learns to blame others, kusang kusang The association of an evil person. Tap to open in glossary → will never depart from his heart.They were called evaders, right? Evaders. An evader has fifty such excuses. Excuses, all kept ready. "Brother, why did such a result come this time?" Then? He gives a list of fifty, "Look at this." Only one is excluded from it, who? Himself. One person is excluded from it, who is excluded? The presenter himself is excluded, "I am a clean sheet in this." My role in this is nothing. In failure, my role is nothing. It is not there. And in all success, so much is my role. They were called evaders, right? Evaders. So, he has gathered all the evidence. But of what? Contrary. So, Maharaj says that kusang kusang The association of an evil person. Tap to open in glossary → will never depart from his heart. The person who learns to gather such evidence, kusang kusang The association of an evil person. Tap to open in glossary → accumulates in his heart. If one learns to gather all evidence in failure, what else would happen in his heart? If one learns to find fault in others, Maharaj said so. Maharaj said, "If someone tells you, jump into a well." So, should you jump? Therefore, it is the fault of the soul itself. It is said to be the fault of the doer. If your result is poor, then it is said to be the fault of the one under whose guidance you are. Whose else's fault can it be? We look for all that other evidence. So, the reason is that we have great love for kusang kusang The association of an evil person. Tap to open in glossary → . Those of us who are evidence-free people, have great love for kusang kusang The association of an evil person. Tap to open in glossary → . In which kusang kusang The association of an evil person. Tap to open in glossary → do they have great love? The internal one. Three types of kusang kusang The association of an evil person. Tap to open in glossary → have been mentioned, right? One internal kusang kusang The association of an evil person. Tap to open in glossary → , one external kusang kusang The association of an evil person. Tap to open in glossary → , and one kusang kusang The association of an evil person. Tap to open in glossary → of satsang satsang 1) True company. The practice of associating with Bhagvãn’s sant, other satsangis, the ãtmã, and the sacred shãstras, and also observing vartmãns and niyams. 2) Also refers to the sampradãy, which is the presence of good company. Tap to open in glossary → . So, the most terrible is the kusang kusang The association of an evil person. Tap to open in glossary → of satsang satsang 1) True company. The practice of associating with Bhagvãn’s sant, other satsangis, the ãtmã, and the sacred shãstras, and also observing vartmãns and niyams. 2) Also refers to the sampradãy, which is the presence of good company. Tap to open in glossary → . And then, the second is this internal kusang kusang The association of an evil person. Tap to open in glossary → . As long as the internal kusang kusang The association of an evil person. Tap to open in glossary → is alive, it does not let any other kusang kusang The association of an evil person. Tap to open in glossary → die. The internal kusang kusang The association of an evil person. Tap to open in glossary → is alive. If the internal kusang kusang The association of an evil person. Tap to open in glossary → dies, then even if those two are alive, it does not cause any problem. And what is the internal kusang kusang The association of an evil person. Tap to open in glossary → ? One's own virtue. Never let the fault come upon oneself. Keep looking for others around. So that if trouble arises, select someone to blame. So, never let the fault be considered one's own. That is the internal kusang kusang The association of an evil person. Tap to open in glossary → . And Maharaj said in the Vachanamrut that as long as one blames others, and Maharaj went as far as to say that one who finds fault in his own senses and antahkaran is a fool. And kusang kusang The association of an evil person. Tap to open in glossary → will never depart from his heart. Even if he grows old. Do old people not have kusang kusang The association of an evil person. Tap to open in glossary → ? Or do they? After the beard turns white, where does kusang kusang The association of an evil person. Tap to open in glossary → remain? Does any of it remain? So, he should be called a fool, Maharaj said so. AI translation of the Gujarati transcript above, produced in the same pass that transcribed the audio, one English segment per Gujarati segment. Devotional and technical terms with no precise English equivalent (kirtan, satsang, vasana, samskara, and similar) are kept as their plain transliteration rather than force-translated. Not human-proofread., AI-translated, unverified · Source details