One who understands this way, does not get attached to God in any way.
And to whom is this story explained?
To one who has such firm conviction.
All of God's actions are for him.
It should be understood like a performer.
Then how can he be deluded? No.
All the actions of the performer that are seen are all false.
All that is seen, then what is proven is true.
If it's not mine, then when it comes, it's proven, isn't it? It's true.
Similarly, all of God's actions, human pastimes, all that he does is a play.
Not false, but still true.
The performer's are all false.
It is illusory for him.
And to make others climb the wrong wall.
But even God's false human pastimes have a purpose.
But God is not like that.
Such feelings about God are wrong.
The pastimes are true.
How are each of God's actions? They are eternal.
They are eternal.
Even if he does new ones, they are eternal.
And if he does old ones, then they are already there.
The giver created as before.
God created this universe, Brahmaji created it according to the previous universe.
So, all the avatars that were in the previous creation, those same avatars are in this creation.
In that way.
Yoga and avatars, all of them.
In the previous creation, there was Rama avatar, and in the previous creation, there was Krishna avatar.
The giver created as before.
So all of God's pastimes are eternal.
Even if he performs some new pastime.
Eternal.
New creation.
Then it becomes eternal.
Now it is eternal.
Even if it's new, it's now eternal.
That has to be set there.
In the board of Sanatan.
And one who understands this way, does not get attached to God in any way.
And this story is.
Then he would say, 'Why should I believe in God if all this is false?'
What to believe?
Believe in those who are in the divine abode.
Believe in those who are devoid of all these worldly emotions, devoid of worldly elements, devoid of worldly actions, and are endowed with divine emotions in the divine abode.
Even if he performs that action.
Even if he performs that action, he should be considered as such.
And this is because it's not even there.
God ate mud.
Mother Yashoda put her hand in his mouth and said, 'Open your mouth, open your mouth, I want to take out the mud.'
So there was no mud.
So sometimes he shows it and sometimes he doesn't, he showed something else there.
So did he eat the mud or not?
What did you say?
It's God's play.
The pastime of eating mud, we have that, isn't it? Is that called eternal or worldly?
The pastime is eternal, but God.
The pastime is eternal, but God did not eat mud.
Ate mud.
So people get confused, is it called eternal or worldly?
God ate mud.
And came stealing.
Someone came and defecated and urinated in someone's stove.
So.
God said.
So these are eternal pastimes, so then it has to be done every time.
Whenever creation happens and Krishna avatar comes, it has to be done every time.
Doing something new is a different matter.
Then.
So then what should I believe about the performer's maya?
Mud, stealing, defecating, urinating, all that is worldly, but what God did is eternal.
So did he do it or not?
Did the performer's hand get cut or not?
So did God do it or not?
You have the form of a devotee of God,
But God, God's devotee is called a school.
In God, all these are God's disgusting actions, and to consider them divine,
When is that considered? When one practices in that school.
If there is even a small flaw in a devotee of God, and it is not digested, then how can it be digested in God?
Then it won't happen to God.
What do you call a devotee of God? Observe.
Observe, absorb, absorb.
It should be absorbed, it should be digested, right?
If you take that capsule and it comes out just as it was, then what?
It won't work.
Absorb.
It should be absorbed, right? So, if any flaw of God's devotee is absorbed by us,
that, okay, this person is like this, so it's fine, they are still a devotee.
Still a devotee.
And still we love him.
Does that happen?
Huh? If one has such a flaw, then it happens.
It doesn't even happen in great people.
In oneself, huh? If it's in oneself, then everything is observed.
If it's in oneself, then everything becomes like that.
If there are big stones in oneself, they get absorbed.
If someone can't walk anywhere and is outside, they break their leg.
If he comes out, he breaks his leg, breaks his arm, like that.
Still, we observe.
What is it called?
Absorb, it gets absorbed.
And it doesn't happen to others, to God's devotee.
So first he learns, then any fault of God is observed.
It can be digested, it can be assimilated.
If someone can't do anything at all, then
And if it can't be done by God's devotee, God does it for him.
God forgives all the faults of other devotees of God.
He does it, doesn't he?
Savior of the fallen, see, the devotee was singing the kirtan, savior of the fallen, patit.
Immortal, I sacrifice myself to your title.
Hey
Girdhar, do not let go of my hand, your unwavering resolve.
It is God's title.
So how much does he absorb?
Savior of the fallen, purifier of the fallen.
He does it for everyone.
He does it for us and for others too.
Ours would have been registered first.
Ours, we first tell God, if you take this first file in your hand, you keep this first one above ours.
It's in our hands to arrange it, then it's in our hands.
That this file comes first in your hand.
But we cannot absorb anyone's.
Then God won't do it.
And if we can't do it for God's devotee, then God won't do it for us.
Others' is fine.
God will leave him.
If he can't do it for God's devotee, then he leaves him.
He says, 'Go ahead, brother, it's fine.'
So, a devotee of God's absorb.
You'll have to write down for me how to spell 'job'.
Absorb.
Huh?
In whose place is that verse?
It's absorb, right, in that.
Say it with 'a' in front.
We say absorb.
Absorb.
Absorb.
Absorb.
So that should happen.
This is the school.
To go to Akshardham in God in this world, to absorb the faults of God,
These are the faults of God's devotee.
Then it's not necessary that all of God's devotees are like that.
God's are perfect, as Maharaj said.
And a devotee of God should keep in mind that if he doesn't do anything against Maharaj's principles, it's not a big problem.
But Maharaj says that as long as one has at least the five vows, one should not find fault with them.
It's not about finding fault.
The form of God's devotee means that by seeing God's actions, one should not believe in God with a feeling like the action.
No.
He saw God's action.
And God's actions are according to the nine rasas, like an action.
In that, the action of the disgusting rasa comes.
So what is the original feeling of the disgusting rasa?
What do you expect?
That is contempt.
Contempt.
Hatred.
Hatred.
Even if he feels disgust towards God, he should feel affection, not hatred.
He feels affection, doesn't he?
If he sees good things, he feels affection, love, and attachment.
Then he should feel attachment.
Whatever action God performs, there should be only one action-reaction.
What?
He should feel affection for it.
Nothing else, nothing else.
It should be only one.
Only one action-reaction.
And the form of God and the form of God's devotee are endowed with light like the light of infinite suns and moons.
Only one who has such firm understanding can comprehend this discourse.
And such a radiant divine
First, it won't be understood if this hasn't been decided, Maharaj says.
And such a radiant divine form of God, for the welfare of beings, graciously manifests as a human being, along with all His powers, opulence, and associates, to enable beings to perform nine types of devotion towards Him.
Even then, those who know such secrets, God's
He comes with that power, but it's all hidden.
God comes, hiding everything, hidden.
And to hide it is his main effort.
That's his way of not being seen at all.
Why does God keep it that way?
So that beings become accustomed to it.
So that there is affection.
They become accustomed and feel affection.
When there is affection for one's own kind, God then
He acts like he's of the same kind, 'I'm like you, there's nothing else in me.'
I am like you.
Come, let's all play.
So he feels affection.
So God pays a lot of attention to it.
He doesn't let it show, he suppresses it as much as possible, suppresses it.
Even then, those who know such secrets understand that the form of God that resides in Akshardham is the same as the human form of God that resides on earth.
But they do not understand the slightest difference between that form and this form.
And in this way, whoever has known God is said to have known God in essence.
If one knows God as divine but does not know His human form, then it is said that one knows Him less.
He should have the human sentiment.
He sees both the human and divine aspects simultaneously.
Then he won't make mistakes.
And that is said to be the cessation of Maya for him.
And one who knows this is called a wise devotee, and he is called an Ekantik devotee.
And in this way, one who has firm devotion to the manifest form of God and never has any doubt about the material nature of God's form,
And he might
Never, Maharaj says, never should he have any doubt about the material nature.
That is, even if God performs actions of a material nature, he does not have a material feeling in them.
Then he experiences divine emotion.
Whose material feeling is it?
All actions are visible.
So if he doesn't have a material feeling, and he only sees the distinction in the actions, saying that these are up-and-down actions, even then it's not considered correct.
That is called divine.
When that happens, it is called devotion.
So it's not visible, but he has fallen into a deep state of emotion.
If his actions, even those of a material nature, do not appear divine, and he sees ordinary actions, and he does not have a low opinion of God.
Even then, it means that he has a little human sentiment within him.
In God.
One must completely remove the human sentiment from God.
When the human sentiment leaves God and the divine sentiment comes, then those actions appear divine to him.
We act
Based on that, we evaluate it.
The action is like a human's, so it is a human.
Maharaj said that one should not evaluate based on the action, but based on its true form, its original form. One should evaluate the action based on its original form.
Its action is like that.
Everyone's actions are the same, eating and drinking.
But there is a difference in both.
There is a difference in the former and the latter.
So the action is of the same kind.
But still there is a difference in both.
Maharaj said, and it is said here, that Lord Shri Krishna's actions were like those of a human.
That's why Parikshit had doubts.
That people do it, but did God also do it?
Then that cannot be called right.
So if one evaluates God from above,
then the action seems divine.
And if one evaluates based on the action, then God also seems material.
So it depends on which side we look from.
Suppose the evaluation is not of human nature.
But when one hears the divine deeds of God,
then such an action, if seen, in human nature,
comes to mind.
So what is that called?
So that is called confusion.
There is no clarity.
There is still no complete clarity.
So that comes to mind, and that also comes to mind.
In human nature, that is not there, is it?
That's right, he has suppressed it.
And he is so careful that no such thought arises in God.
Such is our caution.
But no such thought arises in God.
What does that show?
So it is human nature.
Human nature is there, it has not completely gone from within.
It has not gone from our heart.
So it has to be suppressed.
If he had a divine feeling in it, then that would not even come to mind.
Then he would not even remember it.
This time, the Kalyan issue has arrived.
Radha Madhav issue.
Radha Madhav issue.
It is very good, mostly about Gopi bhava.
What is Gopi bhava called?
So as long as the senses
Hey, the actions of the senses, from the eight senses, as long as they happen, their samskaras are lying in the senses for an infinite time.
So its natural nature is such that it gets what it wants.
Then memories come out of it.
The बात is true.
But all the senses and inner faculties are of a material nature.
That बात is true.
But he has changed the inner body by meditating and contemplating on God.
Just like when you want to make an idol of God, first you make it of clay, then you apply wax on it, make a hole in it, and then you put that in it.
So that keeps coming out, and this clay, that metal idol keeps forming, and then when it's complete, the clay remains as it is on top.
Then it is made.
Similarly, by listening, contemplating, and meditating, one understands what God is. God is both divine and material.
What is God, and what kind of actions are possible in Him, what kind of actions does He perform?
So if one has contemplated and meditated on it, and then sees it practically, then one remembers that this is it.
So, therefore, of contemplation and meditation,
it is called a flaw.
Less.
He should do such contemplation and meditation on God.
And as much as he contemplates and meditates on the divine sentiment, and along with the divine sentiment, he also connects with the material action, that God does this.
So, the best thing in that is the divine pastimes of God.
Both things come in that.
And he comprehends the divine sentiment of it.
Then he keeps doing it repeatedly.
Then one day after that.
Remember just one thing.