Home/Mahant Swami Katha/Satsang Chintan

Perception of the indirect in the direct | Pujya Mahant Swami | Satsang Chintan

Read the whole text

Video

Reading

Coming into divine satsang, the world's dominance does not diminish, satsang does not become dominant, and devotion to God does not arise. A third reason for this is:

That the conviction a jiva has in the indirect form is not present in the direct form.

There is no recognition and no conviction.

The glory of the indirect is not like that of the direct.

The recognition of the indirect is not like that of the direct. There is no recognition at all.

It is said in the Shruti: 'Just as one has supreme devotion to God, so too to the Guru. To such a great soul, all meanings are revealed.'

Just as the jiva has devotion to the indirect deity,

Tasy eva

Tasy eva kathita yarthah. What does that mean? Tasy eva ete, meaning tasy eva ete he artha kathitah sarve prakashanti. This Vachanamrut states that all meanings are attained. All meanings are attained. Brahmanand Swami's ghodi (a type of composition) also states this. What does it say? 'Sab vidhi karaj' (all tasks). 'Sab vidhi karaj siddhi' (all tasks are accomplished). What is the full line? 'Trigunatit' (beyond the three gunas). No, no. It's in the first one. 'Bhav dukh tale, bale sab dushkrit, sab vidhi karaj siddhi.' It's not just about accomplishing tasks for the afterlife. 'Sab vidhi karaj siddhi.' It also applies to this world. Thus, eternal bliss is attained. Nishkulanand Swami and all the saints wrote that we experience much joy. It didn't say, 'Let's accomplish tasks for the afterlife.' But we experience much joy. 'Yasy deve para bhakti yatha deve tatha guru tasyave kathita yarthah prakashante mahatmanah.' Tasy eva, not any other. All these meanings are revealed to him. Which meanings? The meanings stated in the Upanishads. The meanings stated in this Vachanamrut. The world's secondary nature and God's primary nature, the momentum in God, that happens to him. It doesn't happen to others, to anyone else. If the conviction that a jiva has in the indirect form of God comes to the direct form of Hari, who is like a Guru, then all the meanings that are said to be attained will be attained by him. That is, if one has the same devotion towards a Shrotriya and Brahmanishtha Sadguru as one has towards one's Ishtadev, then no meaning of the path to moksha remains unattainable for him. No achievement remains for him. The meaning of 'Guru-rup Hari' (Hari in the form of a Guru) is not that some people here make their Guru directly God, fitting it to themselves. If that were the case, how many would become God? Therefore, one should not believe that. But in a true Sadguru, one should have the same good feeling or divine intellect as in one's Ishtadev. There is that much difference. The worship of God and self-realization in this. One has to worship God. There is no need to worship this. In this, the devotion is like God's. One step ahead of God. There is a beautiful verse somewhere that says, 'Mantra, Dvija, Deva.' If one does not have faith in these, then one's efforts will not bear fruit. No matter how much effort one makes. If one does not have faith in the mantra and keeps chanting it, keeps chanting it, then one's efforts will not bear fruit. They will not bear fruit as they should. So, if one does not have faith in the Guru, then what are one's efforts? Which efforts will not bear fruit? It's fine with the mantra. If the efforts in the mantra do not bear fruit, then what does that mean? If the efforts in the mantra do not bear fruit, then if one does not have faith in the mantra, then these efforts will not bear fruit, it is said. That is what the shastra says, it is said. 'Mantra, Dvija, Deva,' and 'Daivajna' (astrologer) and 'Vaidya' (doctor). There is a long list of many things. If there is an astrologer, a true astrologer, then if there is a confused one, there is no need to have faith in him. If there is a true astrologer, a true astrologer, but if this person does not have faith, then nothing will bear fruit. And 'Dvija, Daiva.' Dvija means one who performs yagna, and if he has a problem with a Brahmin, he will doubt, 'What will this person make me do?' Then how will the fruit of that yagna be obtained? Similarly, if there is a mantra, and if he thinks, 'What will this mantra do for me?' then the effort he made will not bear fruit. The yagna he performs will not bear fruit. And similarly, 'Daiva.' Daiva means Ishtadev. And Guru. If one doubts Ishtadev, then how will one attain God's abode? And in the Guru, one will not succeed in life. If one has doubts about the Guru, what other efforts will one make? One will not achieve success in life. 'Sab vidhi karaj siddhi' (all tasks are accomplished) will not happen to him. He will eat as much as he can fill his mouth with. The whole world fills its mouth like that. 'Sab vidhi karaj siddhi.' His complete task, he will experience much joy. A true Sadguru, saint, and saint, he is said to be worthy of experiencing joy. The meaning of 'Guru-rup Hari' (Hari in the form of a Guru) is not that some people here make their Guru directly God, fitting it to themselves. What Maharaj said here in the shloka, or what was said in the Upanishads, what was said in the shloka of the Upanishads? 'Yasy deve para bhakti yatha deve tatha guru tasyavete kathita yartha prakashante mahatmanah.' 'Yatha deve tatha guru.' 'Yatha tatha' is used there. 'Yat tat' is not used. If 'yat tat' were used, it would mean that the Guru is this. If that were used, it would not be like that. 'Yatha tatha.' What is the meaning of the word 'yatha'? In the said manner. It is a manner-indicating word. The 'thal' suffix is a manner-indicating word. The respect you show to Ishtadev, show the same respect to this. If they are true. If you get caught in the wrong, then you lose. If you get caught in the wrong and try to show the same respect, then it's like serving a wild cow. If by luck you find true ones and show the same respect to them, then all meanings will be revealed. All the attainments mentioned in the Upanishads will be yours. So, in the Upanishads, it is still said, but it is written in a seed form. The saints have written it this way. 'Bhav dukh tale, bale sab dushkrit, sab vidhi karaj siddhi.' That is the main thing, that one's cycle of birth and death ends, and all sins are destroyed. That is correct. But 'sab vidhi karaj siddhi.' Up to here, his life becomes successful here. His effort, his life's effort, becomes successful. And he becomes blessed. The meaning of 'Guru-rup Hari' (Hari in the form of a Guru) is not that some people here make their Guru directly God, fitting it to themselves. If that were the case, how many would become God? Therefore, one should not believe that. But in a true Sadguru, one should have the same good feeling or divine intellect as in one's Ishtadev. Just as it is said in the scriptures for a chaste wife to have divine intellect in her husband. If a chaste wife considers her husband to be God, does her husband become God? No. Yet, if she has true devotion in her heart, God will surely give her fruit and influence. Similarly, cultivating the intellect or faith of Ishtadev in a true Sadguru is one thing, and making one's Guru sit as God is another. That is considered betrayal for the ignorant and innocent society. But in society, the nature of most people is such that either they have conviction in the indirect, or they have conviction in dramatic artificiality, in falsehood. But it does not come in reality. That is why Maharaj says that this jiva does not have conviction in the direct. If someone now says that Ambrish lived such a life and Mirabai lived such a life, then one's head will bow down with reverence. But in the present time, if someone lives a life like theirs, seeing them does not bring conviction. Rather, doubt or boredom arises. Therefore, Maharaj had to say that the conviction that a jiva has in the indirect is not present in the direct. The faith is like a guide. It is a guide. If it gets stuck somewhere in a narrow alley, it will bring it back and take it to the other side. The limb, if it gets stuck somewhere, it cannot turn back. It's a track. If it gets on the track, Maharaj says, if it gets on the right track as soon as it comes, if it doesn't go on the wrong track, and if it gets on the right track, then it crosses. It means there will be no problem for it later. There is no need for a very clever driver. Just keep putting coal, that's all that's needed. The track will take it straight to Delhi. Maharaj said, then we should think, what kind of feeling should we have towards the Nand Saints and what kind of feeling in the direct? The Nand Saints are considered direct. One should have such a feeling towards the Nand Saints that Sukhsanakadik have become like that. It is even more than that. Maharaj said that is still considered less for us. So, that is not considered indirect. One should consider them direct. We don't have such a feeling of reverence towards the indirect, that is, Sukhsanakadik, but it is said that we have it towards the Nand Saints of Maharaj's time. The feeling in the indirect and direct, Sukhsanakadik, that is our culture's influence. It is the influence of culture. But in our culture, it was not highlighted much from the beginning, and this has been highlighted. But is there such a surrender or not? When there is 100% surrender, then it is said that he has attained direct feeling. How much did he pour into this? How much did he pour into this or on its name? And how much did he brighten or dim its brand name? Then it is called direct and indirect. Otherwise, if one just says that these are big and these are small, these are big and these are small, and makes categories of big and small, then it is not said that he has attained direct conviction. Based on time, direct. What? Indirect direct by time? No, nothing like that. It is true that Sukhsanakadik are there. In a person's mind, there is 100% conviction about Sukhsanakadik. 100% intellect, there is no flaw in that. If that same thing comes forward, then it will not remain 100%. It will just become good. So, one should consider the Nand Saints like those, and like the Nand Saints, Maharaj says, if someone is a complete devotee of God, if he has 100% firm faith in God, then he should be considered like those. What is the difference between the two? On what basis is Muktanand Swami's glory? On the basis of Maharaj's faith. On the basis of faith. If someone now has 100% faith, then he is considered like those. It is called direct and indirect. But that does not mean that many people talk like that, that those have died, so what is there in them? Stick to the living ones. What will they do for you? What will they do for you? What will they do? What will those sitting in the picture do? Worship those who are sitting alive. So, that is the desire to be worshipped. For oneself. That is not faith. The meaning of faith is surrender. Just as you are ready to surrender in the name of the indirect, similarly, be ready to surrender in the name of these Nand Saints, and if there is a perfect devotee of God, be ready to surrender in his name. Then it is called direct and indirect. It is called direct.

AI translation of the Gujarati transcript above, produced in the same pass that transcribed the audio, one English segment per Gujarati segment. Devotional and technical terms with no precise English equivalent (kirtan, satsang, vasana, samskara, and similar) are kept as their plain transliteration rather than force-translated. Not human-proofread., AI-translated, unverified · Source details