The aforementioned state of oneness is attained through association with the single-minded devotee of God. But it is not attained merely through samadhi. Here, Maharaj has also indicated through the Vachanamrut that other spiritual endeavors do not possess the same divine power as satsang satsang 1) True company. The practice of associating with Bhagvãn’s sant, other satsangis, the ãtmã, and the sacred shãstras, and also observing vartmãns and niyams. 2) Also refers to the sampradãy, which is the presence of good company. Tap to open in glossary → . Then, even if it is nirvikalp nirvikalp Without alternatives or doubts. Used to describe faith or Tap to open in glossary → samadhi, what of it? Here, we can take a step further In the forty-fifth Vachanamrut, that knowledge, vairagya, knowledge, vairagya, and bhakti bhakti Devotion to Bhagvãn. One of the four attributes of ekãntik dharma. There are nine types of bhakti: Tap to open in glossary → —among these three, which endeavor has the divine power to connect one with God? So here too, to attain oneness means to connect, to connect with God. In that, satsang satsang 1) True company. The practice of associating with Bhagvãn’s sant, other satsangis, the ãtmã, and the sacred shãstras, and also observing vartmãns and niyams. 2) Also refers to the sampradãy, which is the presence of good company. Tap to open in glossary → is said to have more divine power than samadhi. Here, Maharaj, through the Vachanamrut, also... What is satsang satsang 1) True company. The practice of associating with Bhagvãn’s sant, other satsangis, the ãtmã, and the sacred shãstras, and also observing vartmãns and niyams. 2) Also refers to the sampradãy, which is the presence of good company. Tap to open in glossary → ? It is love and mahima, atmabuddhi and mahima; Maharaj has called that satsang satsang 1) True company. The practice of associating with Bhagvãn’s sant, other satsangis, the ãtmã, and the sacred shãstras, and also observing vartmãns and niyams. 2) Also refers to the sampradãy, which is the presence of good company. Tap to open in glossary → . Through that, oneness with God is attained. The aforementioned state of oneness is attained through association with the single-minded devotee of God, but it is not attained merely through samadhi. Here, Maharaj has also indicated through the Vachanamrut that other spiritual endeavors do not possess the same divine power as satsang satsang 1) True company. The practice of associating with Bhagvãn’s sant, other satsangis, the ãtmã, and the sacred shãstras, and also observing vartmãns and niyams. 2) Also refers to the sampradãy, which is the presence of good company. Tap to open in glossary → , then even if it is nirvikalp nirvikalp Without alternatives or doubts. Used to describe faith or Tap to open in glossary → samadhi, what of it? Here, we can also think a step further: in connecting with Paramatma, is there more divine power in satsang satsang 1) True company. The practice of associating with Bhagvãn’s sant, other satsangis, the ãtmã, and the sacred shãstras, and also observing vartmãns and niyams. 2) Also refers to the sampradãy, which is the presence of good company. Tap to open in glossary → or in samadhi? Is there more divine power in agna or in upasana? Is there more divine power in dhyan or in the knowledge of Paramatma's murti murti 1) Sacred idol of Bhagvãn used to offer worship. There are eight types of murtis that can be worshipped: stone, wood, metal, earth, engraved or drawn, sand, gems, and mental. 2) The form of Bhagvãn. Tap to open in glossary → ? All the above endeavors connect one with Maharaj... Knowledge and dhyan, agna and upasana—these are all called wings, aren't they? Samadhi and satsang satsang 1) True company. The practice of associating with Bhagvãn’s sant, other satsangis, the ãtmã, and the sacred shãstras, and also observing vartmãns and niyams. 2) Also refers to the sampradãy, which is the presence of good company. Tap to open in glossary → —these are all called wings. Knowledge and dhyan—so in connecting with God, is dhyan superior or knowledge? Knowledge means mahima. Knowledge does not mean information, but mahima. So to connect with God, is mahima superior or dhyan? Is agna superior or upasana? Which one has more divine power? That is the question, that is the question. Now, samadhi and satsang satsang 1) True company. The practice of associating with Bhagvãn’s sant, other satsangis, the ãtmã, and the sacred shãstras, and also observing vartmãns and niyams. 2) Also refers to the sampradãy, which is the presence of good company. Tap to open in glossary → were mentioned, right? Muktanand Swami asked about samadhi, and Maharaj said satsang satsang 1) True company. The practice of associating with Bhagvãn’s sant, other satsangis, the ãtmã, and the sacred shãstras, and also observing vartmãns and niyams. 2) Also refers to the sampradãy, which is the presence of good company. Tap to open in glossary → . That is, samadhi and satsang satsang 1) True company. The practice of associating with Bhagvãn’s sant, other satsangis, the ãtmã, and the sacred shãstras, and also observing vartmãns and niyams. 2) Also refers to the sampradãy, which is the presence of good company. Tap to open in glossary → . So, just because one endeavor has divine power does not mean the other is useless. But in comparison between the two, which one is greater? One who wants to achieve oneness with God, who wants to connect more with God, which path should they adopt? To what should they give higher priority? It does not mean that agna is useless or dhyan is useless. But on what should one place more emphasis? For one who wants to get closer to God. Here, we can also think a step further: in connecting with Paramatma, is there more divine power in satsang satsang 1) True company. The practice of associating with Bhagvãn’s sant, other satsangis, the ãtmã, and the sacred shãstras, and also observing vartmãns and niyams. 2) Also refers to the sampradãy, which is the presence of good company. Tap to open in glossary → or in samadhi? Is there more divine power in agna or in upasana? Is there more divine power in dhyan or in the knowledge of Paramatma's murti murti 1) Sacred idol of Bhagvãn used to offer worship. There are eight types of murtis that can be worshipped: stone, wood, metal, earth, engraved or drawn, sand, gems, and mental. 2) The form of Bhagvãn. Tap to open in glossary → ? All the above endeavors indeed connect one with Maharaj, but looking comparatively, we have to consider which thing has more divine power. Such a priority order can be determined. All endeavors are indeed useful; through agna also one connects with God, and by practicing dhyan also one connects with God. But if someone wants to prioritize, what should one who wants to connect with God do? To what should they give priority? In this Vachanamrut, Maharaj has not taken up the question of how a simple relationship with God is formed. He has discussed the point of how a relationship of oneness is formed. Therefore, there is a need to compare even the internal endeavors. If the internal value of the endeavors is not in our heart, then even if Maharaj wishes to give His supreme bliss... Which endeavor can do how much work? And what is its limitation, that it cannot do more than this? If one does not know this, then their effort will not be of much use. If the endeavor is great but one does not give time or energy to it, and instead keeps putting more strength elsewhere, they may put more strength, but the other will only give as much as it can, not more. If you feed a goat more, is it going to give as much milk as a buffalo? If the internal value of the endeavors is not in our heart, then even if Maharaj wishes to give us His supreme bliss, we will not be able to receive it. What is meant by value? What is meant by value? It means as much as its capacity is. It does not mean its mahima is not there. Its value means what is its limitation? How much work can it do? This endeavor can do this much work. How much work can austerities do? How much can they do? God's... How much work can devotion to God do? What is the distinct work of both? What did you say? It is the cause of the body's defects. Not the eradication of defects. Its job is not to uproot the defects from their roots. And if you put more emphasis and put emphasis on austerities to remove defects from the roots, then it means that the true nature of the endeavor is not understood. Its job is to cause the body's defects, and devotion's job is to remove the defects from the root. That is, whichever endeavor does a particular job, it does only that. Likewise, the job of satsang satsang 1) True company. The practice of associating with Bhagvãn’s sant, other satsangis, the ãtmã, and the sacred shãstras, and also observing vartmãns and niyams. 2) Also refers to the sampradãy, which is the presence of good company. Tap to open in glossary → is in God... the capacity of satsang satsang 1) True company. The practice of associating with Bhagvãn’s sant, other satsangis, the ãtmã, and the sacred shãstras, and also observing vartmãns and niyams. 2) Also refers to the sampradãy, which is the presence of good company. Tap to open in glossary → is to cultivate oneness with God. And samadhi does not have that power. It may have other powers, samadhi may have other powers, but it does not have this power. If the internal value of the endeavors is not in our heart, then even if Maharaj wishes to give us His supreme bliss, we will not be able to receive it. Even more than agna, dhyan, or nirvikalp nirvikalp Without alternatives or doubts. Used to describe faith or Tap to open in glossary → samadhi, upasana, Maharaj's mahima, and satsang satsang 1) True company. The practice of associating with Bhagvãn’s sant, other satsangis, the ãtmã, and the sacred shãstras, and also observing vartmãns and niyams. 2) Also refers to the sampradãy, which is the presence of good company. Tap to open in glossary → prove to be more powerful in establishing oneness with Maharaj. Here, Muktanand Swami points towards nirvikalp nirvikalp Without alternatives or doubts. Used to describe faith or Tap to open in glossary → samadhi, otherwise Swami could have directly asked the question: what is the means for one who attains oneness with God's form? Why did he not ask that, and why did he ask this? Why did Muktanand Swami say that there is nirvikalp nirvikalp Without alternatives or doubts. Used to describe faith or Tap to open in glossary → samadhi, or some other endeavor—why did he ask that? Could he not have shortened it to: brother, what is the endeavor to attain this oneness? What if he had asked only that? And why did he not ask that? And why did he ask such a question? Why did he ask it? Swami might have thought in his mind that nirvikalp nirvikalp Without alternatives or doubts. Used to describe faith or Tap to open in glossary → samadhi... Not just Swami, we all feel that way. The excitement that people find in samadhi is not found in satsang satsang 1) True company. The practice of associating with Bhagvãn’s sant, other satsangis, the ãtmã, and the sacred shãstras, and also observing vartmãns and niyams. 2) Also refers to the sampradãy, which is the presence of good company. Tap to open in glossary → . Oh, he practices samadhi, he attains samadhi, and he attains nirvikalp nirvikalp Without alternatives or doubts. Used to describe faith or Tap to open in glossary → samadhi. So, to break the mahima that people have and the priority that is in people's minds, to properly align the priority in people's minds, such a question was asked. Otherwise, he could have asked only this question: brother, what is the endeavor for oneness? Then Maharaj would not have had to say that this... Maharaj said it is satsang satsang 1) True company. The practice of associating with Bhagvãn’s sant, other satsangis, the ãtmã, and the sacred shãstras, and also observing vartmãns and niyams. 2) Also refers to the sampradãy, which is the presence of good company. Tap to open in glossary → . But the question itself, along with the answer, the question itself has importance, as to why it was asked in this way. Here, Muktanand Swami points towards nirvikalp nirvikalp Without alternatives or doubts. Used to describe faith or Tap to open in glossary → samadhi, otherwise Swami could have directly asked the question: what is the means for one who attains oneness with God's form? So, we should not understand that Swami has an attraction towards nirvikalp nirvikalp Without alternatives or doubts. Used to describe faith or Tap to open in glossary → samadhi, but this is how it is in the minds of the people. If someone practices dhyan and someone practices upasana—meaning they perform seva while constantly remembering God—then whose mahima increases? This is what lies in the minds of the people. If someone observes agna and just says, 'I will not do this, I will not do that,' and someone practices upasana, someone practices dhyan, and someone listens to mahima, then whose mahima increases among the people? This is what is in the minds of the people. To indicate this, the name of samadhi was used. A seeker should not follow the popular trend. Where all people are running, one should not run blindly. We want to go to God with understanding, don't we? For that, one has to walk with calculation: this work gives this much, and this work gives this much; to this, one should give more importance. But the mention of nirvikalp nirvikalp Without alternatives or doubts. Used to describe faith or Tap to open in glossary → samadhi was made in the question itself, which means that it is primary, and this indication is the very voice of the belief residing in the minds of the entire community of seekers. The oneness that Maharaj speaks of is attained through association with the single-minded Sant Sant A sãdhu. A tyãgi. In the Vachanãmrut, sant refers to sat- purush. Tap to open in glossary → of God. Nishkulanand Swami Nishkulanand Swami Disciple of Sahajanand Swami (Swaminarayan Bhagwan) and author of the Bhaktachintamani, as stated in the scripture's own closing colophon at the end of every chapter. Tap to open in glossary → once asked a question, and Maharaj said that to live in that way, Maharaj said that renunciation by body and by mind, both are needed. Nishkulanand Swami Nishkulanand Swami Disciple of Sahajanand Swami (Swaminarayan Bhagwan) and author of the Bhaktachintamani, as stated in the scripture's own closing colophon at the end of every chapter. Tap to open in glossary → asked: to live in that way, through what is it lived? Is it lived through vairagya, or through what is it lived? In that, he asked only this: is it lived through vairagya, or is there some other endeavor for it? Here, Muktanand Swami asked: is it attained through samadhi, or is there some other endeavor? That is, to show the mind of the people. To behave in such a way by body and by mind, that it is lived through vairagya, is what is in the minds of the people. So, what did Maharaj say there?It is lived through rules. It happens through satsang satsang 1) True company. The practice of associating with Bhagvãn’s sant, other satsangis, the ãtmã, and the sacred shãstras, and also observing vartmãns and niyams. 2) Also refers to the sampradãy, which is the presence of good company. Tap to open in glossary → . It happens through association with the great Purush Purush 1) An akshar-mukta selected by Akshar-Brahm to ‘impregnate’ Prakruti for the creation process, from which countless pairs of Pradhãn and Purush are formed for the creation and sustenance of each brahmãnd. 2) Purush half of the Pradhãn-Purush pair, ‘conceived’ by Mul-Purush and Mul-Prakruti for the creation and sustenance of each brahmãnd. 3) Taken to be masculine in nature, Purush is the controller of Prakruti, and is also distinct from her. He is indivisible, without a beginning, and without an end. He is self-luminous, omniscient, imperishable, satya, kshetragna, and the cause of all the activities that possess a form. He also has a divya body. 4) Also called Mahã-Purush, Mul-Purush or Akshar- Purush. Tap to open in glossary → ; there too, Maharaj gave the same answer. Renunciation in both ways—renunciation by mind and renunciation by body—to live in that way, He gave the example of King Janak, that happens through satsang satsang 1) True company. The practice of associating with Bhagvãn’s sant, other satsangis, the ãtmã, and the sacred shãstras, and also observing vartmãns and niyams. 2) Also refers to the sampradãy, which is the presence of good company. Tap to open in glossary → . There too, He said the same thing. So, it means that satsang satsang 1) True company. The practice of associating with Bhagvãn’s sant, other satsangis, the ãtmã, and the sacred shãstras, and also observing vartmãns and niyams. 2) Also refers to the sampradãy, which is the presence of good company. Tap to open in glossary → is an endeavor superior to vairagya, and also superior to samadhi. Among the people, vairagya is highly valued, and samadhi is highly valued; that is everyone's belief. But there is nothing like satsang satsang 1) True company. The practice of associating with Bhagvãn’s sant, other satsangis, the ãtmã, and the sacred shãstras, and also observing vartmãns and niyams. 2) Also refers to the sampradãy, which is the presence of good company. Tap to open in glossary → . Therefore, Maharaj gave satsang satsang 1) True company. The practice of associating with Bhagvãn’s sant, other satsangis, the ãtmã, and the sacred shãstras, and also observing vartmãns and niyams. 2) Also refers to the sampradãy, which is the presence of good company. Tap to open in glossary → —His everything, His all—to the devotees. His everything, He gave to the devotees. AI translation of the Gujarati transcript above, produced in the same pass that transcribed the audio, one English segment per Gujarati segment. Devotional and technical terms with no precise English equivalent (kirtan, satsang, vasana, samskara, and similar) are kept as their plain transliteration rather than force-translated. Not human-proofread., AI-translated, unverified · Source details