Asur Asur Demon. Evil person. Tap to open in glossary → Such a bhagat Prahlad became. He became such a bhagat that Bhagwan had to bow before him. The brilliance of an asur asur Demon. Evil person. Tap to open in glossary → bhakti bhakti Devotion to Bhagvãn. One of the four attributes of ekãntik dharma. There are nine types of bhakti: Tap to open in glossary → It's called hybrid, isn't it? Just now we brought the seed of that ambali, and they say it produces amla as big as lemons. Now, there are berries like apples. So, the bor (Indian plum) graft would have been placed on an apple tree. Similarly, Narad's bhakti bhakti Devotion to Bhagvãn. One of the four attributes of ekãntik dharma. There are nine types of bhakti: Tap to open in glossary → asur asur Demon. Evil person. Tap to open in glossary → All asurs are much more brilliant than devtas. And if they get the ashro of Bhagwan, who can compare to them? So Prahladji just trusted the name. They went to the ashray of the name. Narayan was not there. Narayan was not in front of him. We still have Maharaj and all the substances and everything present. What was there of Narsinh Bhagwan in front of Prahlad? There was nothing but the name. And he gained faith and took ashro of the name, Prahladji. So, what a powerful bhagat he became. Prahladji developed complete love for Narayan. The birth of such a bhakta bhakta Devotee of Bhagvãn. A follower of Bhagvãn. Tap to open in glossary → asur asur Demon. Evil person. Tap to open in glossary → Ashro should be with love. Taking ashro like a tick to achieve one's own purpose is not called ashro. Gajendra and all of them are said to have taken ashro, and when they were in trouble, they took ashro of Bhagwan. But he had loved Bhagwan his whole life. Draupadi had such love for Bhagwan that she had nowhere else. Such was her love, so that is then considered ashro. Then Bhagwan saved her from that trouble. In trouble, the ashro became stronger. He already had ordinary love. But in trouble, it appeared to him that love for Bhagwan was the only true thing, and all others were false. That's what he saw. And then he called out to Bhagwan. What is the difference between just love and ashro? What is it like in ashram ashram 1) Stage of life. There are four ãshrams in total, each with their duties and responsibilities – brahm-chãrya, grahastha, vãnprasth, and sannyãs. 2) Hermitage. Place where tyãgis live. Tap to open in glossary → And in love, there is no prayer. There isn't much prayer. In ashram ashram 1) Stage of life. There are four ãshrams in total, each with their duties and responsibilities – brahm-chãrya, grahastha, vãnprasth, and sannyãs. 2) Hermitage. Place where tyãgis live. Tap to open in glossary → That Bhagwan, you save me, you are my protector. So this should also be there. It should be with love. Not with authority. I am doing this for you and I am sitting in your ashray, so you should do this, shouldn't you? Not by force. Bhagwan becomes compelled by love. Bhagwan was compelled by Prahladji. But Bhagwan thought in his mind, what reward can I give? I don't have any means to give a reward right now, something that Prahlad did for Bhagwan. That Bhagwan should do for Prahlad. Prahlad had no desire for Bhagwan to do anything for him. He had only taken such ashro. So that was ashro with a selfless attitude. It is not necessary for ashram ashram 1) Stage of life. There are four ãshrams in total, each with their duties and responsibilities – brahm-chãrya, grahastha, vãnprasth, and sannyãs. 2) Hermitage. Place where tyãgis live. Tap to open in glossary → It is said that Prahlad did it for Bhagwan. He did bhajan bhajan Worship. Tap to open in glossary → But Prahlad did this for me, and I couldn't do anything for him. So Bhagwan became a little compelled. And. Bhagwan became agitated. Now what should I do for him? He didn't need anything. And he suffered so much for me, just for me. He didn't do any work, but he suffered. If there is no suffering, a person works. If there is suffering, if no one is bothering us. Then we have to work for Bhagwan. But if one neither suffers nor works, and takes ashro. Then what kind of ashro is that? It's called a tick-like ashro. That ashro is called a tick-like ashro. He does nothing for Bhagwan. So when Bhagwan went to Prahladji, what did Bhagwan think? How to repay him? How to repay him? What should I give him? I haven't been able to give him anything for what he did for me. So what should I give? Thus Bhagwan became very agitated and compelled. That shlok shlok A verse from shãstras. Tap to open in glossary → I don't know the whole shlok shlok A verse from shãstras. Tap to open in glossary → shlok shlok A verse from shãstras. Tap to open in glossary → That Bhagwan told Prahladji, "Santavya mang yadi te samay dilamb samay dilamb." Correct. I remember the whole thing, but not the whole shlok shlok A verse from shãstras. Tap to open in glossary → So sometimes we say that the earth has two qualities. The earth, if you sow one seed in it, gives a thousandfold. Sometimes, it gives even more than a thousandfold. If you plant a mango tree, you sow only one seed, but it yields tons of mangoes for 100 years. It is said that old mango trees are 100 years old. And they yield tons of mangoes. So if you sow a grain of millet, it produces more than 100 grains of millet. So that is the justice of the earth. Similarly, the justice of Bhagwan is also like that. That Draupadiji tied one bandage, and Bhagwan gave her threads more than a thousand times that. I don't know the whole shlok shlok A verse from shãstras. Tap to open in glossary → How many bandages would that make? There is a whole shlok shlok A verse from shãstras. Tap to open in glossary → That Bhagwan told Prahladji. Sudama, with ashro, gave a handful of rice, and Bhagwan made him a golden palace, bringing happiness. I remember the whole thing, but not the whole shlok shlok A verse from shãstras. Tap to open in glossary → So that is one justice of Bhagwan, that he gives a thousandfold. So sometimes we say that the earth has two qualities. But if you break the layer of the earth and diamond mines come out, did anyone go to plant diamonds? The earth, if you sow one seed in it, gives a thousandfold. Sometimes, it gives even more than a thousandfold. If someone plants it, then okay, it's counted as one, one diamond was planted, so a thousand came out. If you plant a mango tree, you sow only one seed. No one went to plant those. But it yields tons of mangoes for 100 years. But when does the earth give a diamond mine? It is said that old mango trees are 100 years old. When you break the upper layer. And it yields tons of mangoes. When its hard layer is broken, then the earth reveals its treasure to it. So that is the justice of the earth. Then it doesn't keep count of how many you planted. That Draupadiji tied one bandage. In this, even if a mango tree gives a thousandfold, it still keeps count that one seed was planted, so okay, I'll make one tree. So he gave threads more than a thousand times that. So there was only one bandage. Similarly, Bhagwan is just and also affectionate towards those who surrender. So Bhagwan gives a thousandfold. When he does justice, he gives a thousandfold. Sudama, with ashro, gave a handful of rice. And if one is surrendered, that surrender compels him. So that is one justice of Bhagwan, that he gives a thousandfold. That what should I give him? And the earth also has justice, that it gives a thousandfold. It doesn't count how much to give. But if you break the layer of the earth and diamond mines come out. Bhagwan gives him the fruit of his actions. So did anyone go to plant diamonds? So Bhagwan is just and Bhagwan is also partial. If someone plants it, then okay, it's counted as one, one diamond was planted, so a thousand came out. No one went to plant those. When does Bhagwan show partiality? But when does the earth give a diamond mine? Partiality and justice are crossing each other. When you break the upper layer. A person who is partial cannot do justice, and one who does justice cannot be partial. When its hard layer is broken, then the earth reveals its treasure to it. Bhagwan plays both roles. Then it doesn't keep count of how many you planted. And he also does justice. In this, even if a mango tree gives a thousandfold, it still keeps count that one seed was planted, so okay, I'll make one tree. And if it is deeper, then he shows partiality. Similarly, Bhagwan is just. So if one does other sadhanas, Bhagwan does justice. And he is also affectionate towards those who surrender. And if one does it with ashro, with ashray. Then Bhagwan does not do justice. And if one is surrendered, and that surrender compels him. Then Bhagwan does not count anything. That now what should I give him? That what should I give him? So Bhagwan became a little like that. That is the justice of surrender. So he became like that because of Prahlad's ashro, and Prahlad took ashro for Bhagwan. And that is the justice of karma karma Action. Deed. Any thought, word, or deed that will sooner or later reap its consequences. Karmas of a person are linked to their rewards (cause and effect). Bhagvãn is the giver of the rewards of the karmas; good deeds reap pleasant rewards, and bad deeds reap painful fruits. Karmas remain with a jeev until it has received its rewards. Tap to open in glossary → There are two types of doing: positive and negative. And Bhagwan is also partial. Negative means to suffer something for him. When does Bhagwan show partiality? If one takes ashro of Bhagwan and has to suffer something. Partiality and justice are crossing each other. Prahlad had to suffer only because he did bhajan bhajan Worship. Tap to open in glossary → And Bhagwan plays both roles. For family, for money, for relatives, everyone suffers. He also shows partiality and also does justice. So just as the earth, when it is on the surface, he does justice. For one's own wealth, money, comfort, convenience. People die a little. And if it is deeper, then he shows partiality. He suffers so much, one does not have to suffer that much for Bhagwan. So if one does other sadhanas, Bhagwan does justice. So Prahlad suffered, he suffered for Bhagwan. Then Bhagwan does not do justice. Maharaj. It is said that Bhagwan's strength increases instantly. Just as Bhagwan became agitated with Prahlad, thinking what should I give him now. The seva of Bhagwan's bhakta bhakta Devotee of Bhagvãn. A follower of Bhagvãn. Tap to open in glossary → So Bhagwan became a little like that. That he becomes eager for darshan darshan Seeing. To see with admiration and devotion. To see Bhagvãn, a sat-purush, and murtis, with inner or outer vision, with the intention of receiving their grace and blessings. By doing darshan properly a bhakta develops affection for Bhagvãn, and Bhagvãn develops affection for that bhakta. [Sãrangpur – 2]. Tap to open in glossary → Like time. Hey. If an order is given, like a child. There are two types of doing: positive and negative. If an order is given, one thinks in mind that I should go, I should do it. Negative means to suffer something for him. If Maharaj has a desire in his mind, then I should do it. If one takes ashro of Bhagwan and has to suffer something. And there are small and big actions of one's body. Prahlad had to suffer only because he did bhajan bhajan Worship. Tap to open in glossary → For family, for money, for relatives, everyone suffers. So by giving oneself trouble, what is the meaning of Anukulyasya Sankalpa? People die a little for their own wealth, money, comfort, convenience. Rakshishyati vishwaso gopatrutva varnan tatha atmanikshep karpanyam shad vidha sharanagati. So Prahlad suffered, he suffered for Bhagwan. These are the characteristics. What is the meaning of Anukulyasya Sankalpa? Maharaj said that Bhagwan's strength increases instantly, what remedy did he suggest? It's not that we should take ashro of Bhagwan only if it is convenient for us. Nothing like that should be done. It is also said in one place. That he becomes eager for darshan darshan Seeing. To see with admiration and devotion. To see Bhagvãn, a sat-purush, and murtis, with inner or outer vision, with the intention of receiving their grace and blessings. By doing darshan properly a bhakta develops affection for Bhagvãn, and Bhagvãn develops affection for that bhakta. [Sãrangpur – 2]. Tap to open in glossary → We only face adversity. Hey. If we keep our convenience and Bhagwan's convenience, then we would have to go find new Bhagwans. What should I do? If Maharaj has a desire in his mind, then I should do it. It is not possible to keep both our convenience and Bhagwan's convenience. And the small and big actions of one's body, he hurries and performs Bhagwan's actions. We have to take out convenience from our convenience and give him convenience, so we have to take adversity. So Bhagwan, Prahlad suffered a lot. So by giving oneself trouble, what is the meaning of Anukulyasya Sankalpa? It was a risk to life, wasn't it? And it wasn't just a one-time risk to life, every day he would wake up and face a risk to life. Anukulyasya Sankalpa Pratikulasya Vardhanam. And why risk life? Rakshitya vishwaso gopatrutva varnan tatha. He just took ashro of Bhagwan. So nothing else. Atmanikshep karpanyam shad vidha sharanagati. So Bhagwan became agitated. So what is the meaning of Anukulyasya Sankalpa? What he did for me. Convenient for Bhagwan. That is one characteristic of ashro. So that means. That they do something for Bhagwan, that is ashro. What is the meaning of Anukulyasya Sankalpa? What did he do for Bhagwan instead of ashro? We. That is called ashro. It's not that we should take ashro of Bhagwan only if it is convenient for us. If one takes ashro and sits with folded hands and keeps praising Bhagwan that you are very great, you are very great, that is not called ashro. Anukulya, what happens when it becomes convenient for Bhagwan? It becomes inconvenient for oneself. For Bhagwan, that is called insignificance, if one's effort is lost, then it is said to have gone into insignificance. If we keep our convenience and Bhagwan's convenience, then we would have to go find new Bhagwans. Insignificance means like trash, not something to be counted. It is not possible to keep both our convenience and Bhagwan's convenience. He does nothing for Bhagwan. Then Bhagwan does not give him a measure, that he did so much for me, so I will give him so much, he does not give anything like that. We have to take out convenience from our convenience and give him convenience, so we have to take adversity. But he has to throw this somewhere. There was extreme adversity. So it is called nikshep, it is not said to put it down gently so that there is no problem. AI translation of the Gujarati transcript above, produced in the same pass that transcribed the audio, one English segment per Gujarati segment. Devotional and technical terms with no precise English equivalent (kirtan, satsang, vasana, samskara, and similar) are kept as their plain transliteration rather than force-translated. Not human-proofread., AI-translated, unverified · Source details