This Vachanamrut is about supreme liberation. What is called supreme liberation? What is called supreme liberation? What is said in this? What does attainment mean? Put it on your shoulder. What does attainment mean, Bhikhabhai? Huh? That mic also might not have heard it. Meeting means attainment. What does attainment mean? God and God's devotee's... what was the last part? Read those two lines. And those Sadhu of God are superior even to deities like Bhava and Brahma. When that God or God's Sant Sant A sãdhu. A tyãgi. In the Vachanãmrut, sant refers to sat- purush. Tap to open in glossary → What? What is supreme liberation? Attainment of God and God's Sant Sant A sãdhu. A tyãgi. In the Vachanãmrut, sant refers to sat- purush. Tap to open in glossary → To get a chance to serve them. In life, to get a chance to serve God's Sant Sant A sãdhu. A tyãgi. In the Vachanãmrut, sant refers to sat- purush. Tap to open in glossary → No other liberation like that... No. No means of liberation like that. Maharaj made both the means and the goal one. If one gets to serve God's devotee, then there is no other greater means of liberation than that. Not other than that. What is supreme liberation? Nothing else like it. Nothing else like it. There may be others, but not like this. Even if one just gets a chance, they have attained supreme liberation. One should get a chance in life. Now, if one gets a chance, only if they do it, right? They will do it. Getting a chance means they have to do it. If they get a chance to do it, they do it. What if they don't do it? They might have got the chance, but if they don't do it, will they be liberated? But getting a chance is a matter of great fortune. Not everyone gets such a chance. The chance to serve God and God's true Sant Sant A sãdhu. A tyãgi. In the Vachanãmrut, sant refers to sat- purush. Tap to open in glossary → If one loses it, there is no end to their misfortune either. If it is obtained, if the chance is obtained, there is no end to fortune, and if it is lost, there is no end to misfortune. Going to the abode, going to the abode is liberation, just liberation, and meeting a Sadhu is supreme liberation. Supreme liberation is said to be like that. Liberation means going to the great abode, that is indeed liberation, it is great. But when does one go to the abode? Without this, one cannot go. Without this, one cannot go. Going to the abode is liberation, and this is supreme liberation. Why is it so? Through this, the abode is attained. Through this, the abode is attained. This is not attained through the abode. This is not attained through the abode; the abode is attained through this. If there is a means, is a ripe mango great or is the mango tree great? Who is great? Huh? The mango tree is great. Why? Ripe mangoes keep coming out of it, they keep coming out. So from the means, such supreme liberations keep coming out, they keep coming out. It does not happen that the means keep coming out of the fruit, they keep coming out. From this, even if it is not there, it keeps coming out. Infinite liberations keep coming out. Infinite liberation itself is supreme liberation. It is great liberation. It does not happen that another fruit comes out of a fruit. Many fruits keep coming out of the means. So Maharaj said that there is no other liberation greater than getting such a chance or getting a platform. But what is the reason that it is not valued? Maharaj says further in this that it is not valued much. What is the reason for that? Because they have never done such service before. They have not served God and God's devotee before. So they have hesitation in their mind whether what they got will bear fruit for them or not. They have hesitation. If they had served in the past and if its power has come this time, then there is no hesitation, they would have wonder. They would have wonder twenty-four hours a day. That I have got this. Not having wonder is a deficiency of the past birth. It is a deficiency of the past birth. Then Shriji Maharaj said, "In the four Vedas, Puranas, and histories, the only story is that God and God's Sant Sant A sãdhu. A tyãgi. In the Vachanãmrut, sant refers to sat- purush. Tap to open in glossary → And those Sadhu of God are... then Maharaj left God aside. They are to be taken once. They are to be taken once. Sadhus are many, so they have to be taken many times, right? When it comes to Sadhus, Maharaj stood up. Service to God and God's Sant Sant A sãdhu. A tyãgi. In the Vachanãmrut, sant refers to sat- purush. Tap to open in glossary → Otherwise, they would not have said that Maharaj, God and God's Sadhus are, not like that. Maharaj says, "God's Sadhus are," They are rare even to Bhava and Brahma. So is God not rare to Bhava and Brahma? God comes out of a Sadhu. This is supreme liberation. Sadhus keep giving God to so many, they keep giving, they keep giving. It is a factory. And God is not a factory of Sadhus, on the other hand. With great effort, one becomes a Sadhu. Although Sadhus come from God, still, who knows for what reason Maharaj praised the Sadhu so much. That supreme liberation. If one serves a Sadhu, Maharaj's intention is to say that if one serves a Sadhu, it is supreme liberation. And if one serves God, it is liberation. If one serves God, it is liberation. Why? That is the fruit of attaining this. To have faith in this as it is, that itself is a supreme matter for them. Otherwise, in God, because of His greatness, one feels like serving Him. God is so great, so everyone is ready even to carry the shoes of a great person. So God is unrivaled. That He has no rival at all. So having devotion in His service, it is not that it happens because of devotion to this. That happens because of His greatness. He possesses such attractive qualities. God is like that, so it happens. And if it happens in this, it is called supreme liberation. Then they will never have to leave God... from this. So if devotion does not happen in God, it is liberation, and if devotion happens in Sadhu, it is supreme liberation. Everywhere, service to Sadhu is said to be greater than service to God, right? Maharaj said in Mansi Puja, Serve God a hundred times and serve Sadhu once. Maharaj said so. Why is it so? Because to have it in this is rare. Firstly, there is human nature. God is a great personality. And these, on the other hand, are like us. They are like us, and yet they are not like us, that is very difficult. They are like us, and not to consider them like us, that is very difficult. God is not like us, so no one considers Him like us. And these are like us, and not to consider them like us. In the four Vedas, Puranas, and histories, the only story is that, They are not like us, but they do everything like us, so in reality, they are not like us. God is, He is not like us, but He does just as we do, so we feel that He is like us. He eats as we eat, He sleeps stretched out as we sleep, that is common. Some rare ones sleep standing up. He sleeps as we sleep. He gets angry as we get angry. He fights as we fight. He does like us, so He seems like us, but He is not like us. He is not like us. One who believes that He is not like us, They attain supreme liberation, so Maharaj says. Their supreme liberation. If it is believed in God, they are liberated, and if it is believed in Sadhu, they attain supreme liberation. Because to believe in Sadhu is a bit more difficult. It is rare. And to believe in God is not that difficult. So if it is believed in Sadhu, they attain supreme liberation. But if they sit with the notion that they are not even like us, then how will they succeed? They are brainless, so basically, the comparison is of intellect like ours, whether they have intellect as much as ours or not? The comparison is of intellect itself. Does any person make a comparison like, "I am five feet, so he is not five feet"? And if they do, no one except fools would do that. Fools imagine things like, "I am big, or fat or thin." But see, mostly the wise ones imagine that. Huh? He does not have as much as I do. He does not have intellect as much as I do. I know computers, he does not know, he is outdated. In the four Vedas, Puranas, and histories, the only story is that God and God's Sant Sant A sãdhu. A tyãgi. In the Vachanãmrut, sant refers to sat- purush. Tap to open in glossary → If such a matter is accepted, then they have attained supreme liberation. That they are not like us, still if it is accepted, then they have attained supreme liberation. If there are true Sadhus of God and that is accepted by them. But is it accepted? How can such great Sadhus be accepted? Is a Sadhu accepted? Is a Sadhu accepted or what is accepted? They are accepted. They are not accepted. Such great Sadhus in the throat, like this throat is so narrow, and these with such fat hands and feet, and again if they move their hands like this, then they choke in the throat. AI translation of the Gujarati transcript above, produced in the same pass that transcribed the audio, one English segment per Gujarati segment. Devotional and technical terms with no precise English equivalent (kirtan, satsang, vasana, samskara, and similar) are kept as their plain transliteration rather than force-translated. Not human-proofread., AI-translated, unverified · Source details