Jag ga ma ma ga dhe re ka ga re Jag ga ma ma ga dhe re ka ga re
Om Avtarine Shri Swaminarayanaya Namo Namah
Shri Harikrishnaya Namo Namah
Shri Purna Purushottamaya Namo Namah
Shlok number 112
Atashchasya swarupeshu bhedo gneyo na sarvatha chaturadi bhujatvam tu dvibahostasya chaichhikam
For this reason, one should not perceive any difference in the forms of Shri Krishna Bhagwan.
And the distinctions of having four arms, eight arms, a thousand arms, etc., that are seen, are to be understood as being by the will of Shri Krishna, who is dvibhuj (two-armed).
Shri Krishna Bhagwan is one.
Why does that happen? Because the bhakta has such a wish.
So Bhagwan gives him such darshan.
Or the bhakta's nature is such that it suits the bhakta.
According to that, Bhagwan has four arms, eight arms, a thousand arms.
He showed Arjuna a thousand arms.
Some see four arms.
He shows eight arms to some, such is the bhakta's sentiment.
Bhagwan is dvibhuj (two-armed).
The original form is dvibhuj (two-armed).
Shri Krishna Bhagwan is one, yet due to the devotee-bhaktas residing with him, he is known by different names like Radhakrishna.
Maharaj has said in the first Vachanamrut, hasn't he, that a bhakta of Bhagwan goes to Bhagwan's abode, and some go by sitting on a vimana, some go by sitting on a rath, and some go by sitting on a garuda.
What is the reason for that?
The bhakta's wish.
That he has a wish that, 'I have done the plane, but not the garuda.'
Then Bhagwan fulfills it for him.
Bhagwan brings a garuda.
And in today's era, we have traveled a lot in motor cars, but that old rath, like a groom's, is not there.
So Bhagwan brings such a groom's rath and says, 'Come on.'
He fulfills your wish.
Bhagwan has no need for a vimana or anything else.
If he resolves, he can destroy it.
Shri Krishna Bhagwan is one, yet due to the devotee-bhaktas residing with him, he is known by different names like Radhakrishna.
As stated in the previous shlokas.
The dvibhuj kishore is time.
It is determined in the shastras that this is his state.
This is the height, this is the state.
All that has been decided.
But if a bhakta wishes that Bhagwan should hold a morali (flute).
Then Bhagwan holds a morali.
Bhagwan holds a mala (rosary).
Bhagwan holds a bow and arrow.
We have talked many times, haven't we, that we went to Katak once.
Then Krishnapriya Swami was with them, Krishnapriya Swami and Krishnaswarup Swami went to Katak.
There was a bhakta there, and his home temple was very good.
Then Krishnapriya Swami asked about his history.
He asked, 'Where did you get such a wonderful satsang?'
Even if no sadhus go there, he maintains such a great satsang, a beautiful temple, and offers thal.
So he said, 'My mother was a satsangi.'
That brother spoke.
That my mother was a satsangi.
And she got cancer at 35, so when she was 35 years old,
in the abode.
in the abode.
We all went there when we were young, some 10-12 year old children.
But our mother was a great satsangi, and because of her samskaras, we had satsang.
When she went to the abode, God gave her darshan in the form of Shri Krishna.
So that mother said, "I am a devotee of Swaminarayan."
And if you come wearing a three-cornered turban, I will enjoy it very much.
You gave me darshan playing the flute.
So Maharaj changed his form.
And Maharaj came in his original form and Maharaj took her away.
Such a lonely brother was there, and in some distant land, he had no satsang, no company of sadhus.
Even then, he just says that.
If someone comes wearing a three-cornered turban, I feel peace.
So Maharaj shows the flute to someone and tells someone else.
Maharaj did this to test him and to show others that, look, such are our devotees.
Nothing else tempts them.
Even in other avatars, he does not find peace.
Gunatitanand Swami has said that if someone is connected to God and connected to a sadhu, how can one know that?
So if one is connected to God, how can one know?
Whose character and actions.
Whose character and actions.
He likes only that.
He can only be engrossed in his character.
He respects other characters.
But such a thing, where his soul gets lost in the character of Maharaj, does not happen anywhere else.
So it means that he is connected to Maharaj.
If he enjoys other avatar charitras very much, then it means that that devotee is connected to that murti.
So this is his test.
God gives darshan to him as per his wish.
So, the two-armed and four-armed forms are his choice.
It is by his will.
His wish, his own wish, is not like that.
So then it is subject to the devotee of God.
So even if the devotee of God does not have such a wish at that time, it's fine, but if he has a great interest during the period of spiritual practice, then God fulfills it in the end.
Even if he doesn't have the desire then, just as Dhruvji told God, "Maharaj, I no longer have any desire for a kingdom."
But when he started his spiritual practice, he had resolved that he would get such a kingdom.
I should get a kingdom even bigger than my father's.
Then he did bhajan, so he became desireless, and such a desire did not remain.
God gave darshan.
He gave darshan and said, "Mike."
So I have no desire to ask for anything.
Why don't you have a desire? You were saying that in the beginning, you did it for that very reason.
Austerity.
But still, he said, "Now that I have done your bhajan, I have no desire left in my heart."
God says, "Your desire was that, and I fulfilled it. If there is no desire now, it's fine."
God's push should never go in vain.
And the devotee's spiritual practice should not go in vain.
So even if he has made a resolution by mistake, it is God's vow to fulfill it.
So a true devotee should not make such a resolution by mistake.
Dhruvji made a resolution, and then he had to stay there for 36,000 years, right?
Then he has to go to Val.
So if a resolution is made by mistake, it gets delayed.
So a devotee of God should not make such a resolution even by mistake.
For those who are in a hurry.
Those who are at ease have no problem.
If someone is at ease and has two or three unfulfilled resolutions that we cannot complete, then keep them, and God will complete them.
Lord Shri Krishna is one, yet due to the devotee servants residing with him, he is known by different names like Radhakrishna, as stated in the previous verses.
Therefore, there is no difference in the names or forms of Radhakrishna and others, who are enshrined in the big temples of Lord Shri Krishna.
Perhaps someone might doubt that Lakshminarayan Dev is four-armed, and Gopinath Maharaj is two-armed, but Maharaj said there is no difference even then.
Perhaps someone might doubt that if the devotees are different, then there is no difference in the form, you may say so, but if the Lord's two-armed and four-armed forms are different, then why is there no distinction in his own form?
That is his wish.
And according to the devotee's liking, God has assumed such a form.
God is one.
Perhaps someone might doubt that if the devotees are different, then there is no difference in the form, you may say so.
But because the two-armed and four-armed forms of God are different,
those forms are different, one
Those forms are different.
Those forms are different.
But that doubt is not appropriate.
Because Lord Shri Krishna is always two-armed, with two hands.
Whether he becomes four-armed, eight-armed, or thousand-armed, his will is the main reason for that.
When or the liking of God's devotee.
It's not said here, but
It is God's independent will to show the four-armed form, or the eight-armed form, or the thousand-armed form.
And that will of God is subject to the devotee of God.
Whenever and wherever it seems appropriate, he gives such a four-armed darshan.
Therefore, it cannot be said that the forms of God are different due to the difference in their shapes.
He gave darshan in the four-armed form to King Muchukunda and others.
He gave darshan in the eight-armed or thousand-armed form to Arjuna and others.
In that, the will of God, who fulfills the desires of devotees, is the master of Yogamaya, and has true resolve, is the regulator, that is the reality.
This is the same Krishna.
The one who gave darshan to Muchukunda was the same Krishna, and he gave darshan to Arjuna.
He gave to Akrur, they were all one.
Lord Shri Krishna is always a two-armed deity, and in the Brahma Vaivarta Purana and Skanda Purana,
the words 'Murlidhar with two arms' should be taken as evidence here.
Murlidhar, Dhanushdhar, and Maladhar, even they keep it according to the devotee's wish.
Otherwise, where does God need to hold anything?
God's form is such, his nature is such, that everyone gets engrossed in it.
Where did Sukdevji say that he saw the flute just now or something like that? There was nothing like that.
It is said, 'Ittam bhut guno Harihi'.
God's form is like that.
Commentary
Shri Radhakrishna
In the worship and meditation of God,
some worship the child form, some
that
some worship the child form of God, Ghanshyam Maharaj.
Some worship Harikrishna Maharaj or a youthful form of God, or a mature form like the murti in this assembly.
So, in all those forms of worship, is there any difference?
Nothing.
Maharaj said in the Vachanamrut that this is called Balmukund, and this is called Murli Manohar, and this is called
Don't perceive any difference in them.
One should only do one's meditation and worship.
Or do only one of the whole.
To keep track of everyone, something like that.
Everyone should keep track.
That these are the forms of that God.
But practice only one.
Then it becomes accomplished.
God has infinite forms and infinite natures.
The devotee cannot reach everywhere; the devotee has limitations, and God has greatness.
So, it's not like one can control the entire form of God.
It happens at any one place.
There are 15 roads related to Hyderabad.
Whether one goes to Nagpur, Mumbai, Bangalore, or Vijayawada, if one enters through any one path, they will reach Hyderabad.
So, if one grasps with a single sentiment, only then will it be accomplished.
If he is on the ring road and says, 'I don't want to enter Hyderabad from Mumbai, I want to enter from Nagpur.'
If he goes there and says, 'I want to go to Vijayawada,' then he cannot enter.
So, any devotee of God should choose one form according to their own preference.
Whether it is the child form of God, or the inherent form of God, or any form of Thaal, whatever it may be.
One should decide on one for their worship, for their devotion.
To understand him, one must understand everyone.
To understand the glory, one must respect all the divine deeds of the one God. Maharaj even said that one should respect the divine deeds of other avatars as well.
But to connect oneself, there must be a definite, resolute intellect, O son of Kuru, for the intellects of the irresolute are many-branched and endless.
Eka means only one, he needs to focus on one, that I want to realize this God.
Then God, when he goes to God's abode, that is God's original form.
We may have darshan of many forms of God, and all those darshans are remembered.
So, how do we know that only one form has been realized, that this form has been realized?
How do we know that only one form of God has been realized, that this one form has been realized by us?
We should listen to the divine play. When we have darshan of Maharaj and Ghanshyam Maharaj, and we go to another temple, there is the murti of Thaal.
So, in this, one should understand that Ghanshyam Maharaj is eating, isn't he?
If he stands like this, he is giving blessings to some devotee.
It's the same, what else is there to understand?
And that's it, that's the reality.
So where is the difference in that?
But still, we keep changing the focus of our meditation every now and then.
Then nothing will happen to us.
It won't happen even with that.
So, don't keep changing the method of meditation repeatedly.
All these who have darshan, Maharaj is standing in this manner, he is the same Maharaj.
Maharaj's divine plays are numerous.
Sometimes they perform Shakotsav, sometimes Annakutotsav, sometimes other festivals.
If we liked one festival, then what should we do when we want to have darshan of another festival?
That Maharaj does this.
Maharaj's divine play is endless, with many poses, many pastimes, and many other things.
Nishkulanand Swami wrote this, what is it, Harismruti.
How many thousands of photos of Maharaj must have been taken in it?
He has seen him eating this, and he has seen him eating this, and he has seen him eating this.
So, we would have gotten used to eating dudhpak because we like it, so then what else is there to listen to?
Then, if we don't like churma or laddus, what should we do when such a pose comes?
Then, what's the problem with saying that Maharaj wouldn't even eat?
Nishkulanand Swami has captured a thousand poses.
It must be more than a thousand.
He took a thousand such photos.
He has seen him eating like this.
And he has seen him like this.
And he has seen Bhudhar.
And he has seen Durge.
And he has seen him eating.
It is blissful.
It is astonishing.
He has taken all such photos.
He has done some sorting.
Nishkulanand Swami says he did it by sorting like this.
That there are so many photos.
Which one did we like?
If one photo is liked, then the other 999 should not be rejected, right?
All 999 are photos of God.
And one should have proper darshan of them, with devotion.
But in this, the daily practice that needs to be done, is to be done with one photo.
We meditate on the child form of God.
Yes.
Yes.
And then comes the divine play of the adult form.
We listen to it or have darshan.
So, in that, should we see the child form or the adult form?
No, no, the adult.
Because the child form doesn't remain a child form forever, they grow up, don't they? We have the divine play.
When we listen, when we listen to Maharaj's charitras, Maharaj remains in the form of a child.
He became this big, this big, this big, this big.
So he remained the same.
Devdatta himself.
The one who was here 15 years ago is still here now.
Such recognition happens in it.
So, in that way, the lila is not something different.
If some student studied here 15 years ago and then comes after 15 years, we would say to him,
"Hey, you are that one!"
So what happens in that?
Recognition.
Recognition happened.
15 years ago, he used to roam around here wearing shorts, and now he's in a suit, looking very grand.
He has come in a Mercedes car.
15 years ago, I had threatened that rascal.
But if he came now, would there be a difference in him?
Huh?
It cannot be said that there was any difference in it.
He was small then, and now he has grown up.
So, keep the present in mind.
But when he comes back now, one should not behave with him in the same way as before.
Then, one should behave properly.
So Maharaj, Maharaj is only one.
During Maharaj's life, this is what was said.
Now.
It was said that God gave darshan to Muchukunda, God gave darshan to Arjuna, God gave darshan to Akrura, God gave darshan to Yashoda, but God gave darshan to all in different poses.
But everyone was given in different poses.
Some with four arms, some with eight arms, some with two arms, and some with a thousand arms.
So the person is the same.
So, one should not understand any difference in it.
So, why did he give darshan of two arms to him, four to me, and eight to him?
Don't think that he is his beloved.
He had a desire from the beginning, and he had a strong inclination for eight in his mind.
So God shows him eight.
If we have an inclination for two, then he shows two.
Originally there are two.
God is omnipresent.
Alright.
Shri Radhakrishna.
Who is it?
Swami, we haven't heard the charitras of any other avatar except Maharaj right now.
So, if we desire Maharaj's charitras, how do we know that our conviction in Maharaj is firm?
If one is free anywhere.
Our interest and our passion.
That is our passion, and it brings satisfaction.
So, if we don't have any program, and we have taken a vow to recite the Bhagavat during Chaturmas, saying, 'I must recite the Bhagavat during Chaturmas.'
Then that is not called our passion.
But now, if we are free and say that we want to read, then our hand directly goes to Maharaj's charitras.
Maharaj's interest test was taken, wasn't it?
When Maharaj was young, an interest test was taken.
That a book was placed, a dagger was placed, and money was placed, and then Maharaj was inspired for devotion, saying, 'Look.'
So Maharaj ran, making sounds of 'hav hav.'
And he directly placed his hand on the book.
So, his natural interest is more satisfied there, which we call passion in today's language.
His passion is more in that.
So, if we are drawn to Maharaj, and if we are more drawn to the charitras of other avatars, then our passion is said to be there.
And where there is passion, there is also attachment.
Passion itself is attachment.
In a normal program, that is not called attachment.
So, if our passion fits into that, then we are said to be connected with Maharaj.
And if not.
Wherever our passion goes and stands, there we are said to be connected.
So, it should be changed.
Suppose, before satsang, someone was doing devotion.
They might be worshipping Lord Rama, or Lord Krishna.
Even sometimes they might be worshipping deities.
Before satsang, it happens like that.
Then, after satsang, we should develop passion for Maharaj.
For that, one should make an effort.
What is that effort?
So, listening to the divine narratives of God, contemplating them, and developing a taste for them, means it will happen.
If someone has done it by studying diligently, then if one studies this and does it with full awareness and alertness, it will happen quickly.
That's it.
So, passion can be natural, and it can also be developed.
In today's language, it can also be developed.
And it can also be natural.
When we are born, we are born with some natural passion.
Then, if one wants to develop that passion, it can be developed.
If one wants to change it, it can be changed.
And all its means are given in satsang.
That's it.
What?
The kirtans composed by the Nand saints, they contain sentiments of gopi-bhava and such. So, when one listens to them, it is understood that these are the divine narratives of Maharaj, even if they contain sentiments of other incarnations. So, is that considered correct or not?
The kirtans composed by the Nand saints were created with a very broad vision. Before the vision of the Nand saints, the entire world was a platform.
The whole world.
So, from that, they wanted to introduce Maharaj. So, whether it's the divine narratives of Krishna Bhagwan or Ram Bhagwan, the saints also composed kirtans for all the Narasimha Jayantis.
The saints also composed kirtans for Vaman Jayanti.
And the divine narratives of Shri Krishna Bhagwan, that is a great ideal of gopi-bhava, which means prema-lakshana bhakti, and it is renowned in the scriptures.
Therefore, more kirtans of prema-lakshana have been composed.
Maharaj.
But in his vision, there was a larger platform ahead, that the souls of the entire world would find interest in our kirtans, and then gradually they would connect with Maharaj.
And once they connect with Maharaj, they won't need anything else.
They will connect with Maharaj.
So, what the Nand saints did, just as the Vedas deal with the three gunas, meaning the Vedas, when they prescribe some ritual for a tamasic person,
it doesn't mean that only that is found in the Vedas.
In the Vedas, there are even superior things than that.
That there is only one God.
But if one has not yet attained that level, then the Vedas' intention is to gradually change one's level.
What is the purport of the Vedas? "The Vedas speak indirectly, for the instruction of the ignorant."
It commands an action to make one give up another action.
It commands an action to make one give up another action.
So that those weak actions are abandoned and one engages in good actions.
The kirtans composed by the Nand saints were made so that instead of being attached to other gods and goddesses, one becomes attached to Shri Krishna Bhagwan.
And after becoming attached to Shri Krishna Bhagwan, when one's inner self becomes pure, then one will become attached to Maharaj.
And once one becomes attached to Maharaj, there will be no need to go anywhere else.
With such a great intention, the Nand saints composed all those kirtans.
That's it.
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And
And even from that, those who have unwavering devotion, they get at least this much: that Maharaj has said that we keep observing, if there is a lustful person or a greedy person, and they have attachment to wealth and women, then what did Maharaj say? That we keep thinking that we should have such devotion to God.
So, understanding those kirtans properly, one should ask: "Do we have the same love for Maharaj as the gopis had for Lord Shri Krishna?"
Those kirtans were composed to check that.
How much do we have in Maharaj?
The gopis had such love; a vivid description of that has been given.
And if one doesn't immerse their soul in that depiction, how will they know that such love exists?
And then, such love is to be directed towards Maharaj.
That is why the Nand saints have done it with a very broad vision.
That's it.
So, Nand
It doesn't mean that he didn't know anything or that he didn't have faith in Maharaj.
It also doesn't mean that the Nand saints were not connected to Maharaj.
It's not that he was not connected to Maharaj because he took interest in the stories of other avatars.
Maharaj says that his vision was very broad.
His practical behavior, which was to make countless jivas like Sukha and Sanakadika, is considered his great compassion.
His bodily attachment, or his interest in other avatars besides Maharaj, was for the purpose of connecting everyone else to Maharaj. Those saints had such a broad vision.
Our vision is only so much, and if we try to measure it, we cannot measure it.
Maharaj.
Lord Shri Radhakrishna, Shri Lakshminarayan, and Shri Narnarayan, who are known by different names, appear different due to the association of devotees who are like Radhaji and Lakshimiji.
In reality, the Gods worshipped by those devotees are not different, but they are one.
In the same way, even if the form of that God appears somewhere as four-armed or eight-armed, or appears different, the forms are not different.
Now it is said that God is one in form.
Therefore, in the forms.
The different forms of God, such as four-armed, eight-armed, and thousand-armed, are based on the will of that two-armed God.
That is, the forms like four-armed or eight-armed are of the two-armed Purushottam Bhagwan, so understand it that way.
Here, God is referred to as two-armed.
Therefore, it should be understood that in Akshardham, Lord Shri Hari is always two-armed.
That Skandha.
Maharaj said to understand upasana.
That is a very difficult task.
So, in no way should there be any betrayal of God, nor of the avatar.
And also, one should not undervalue God somewhere.
So, that kind of thing, and also keeping the scriptures in mind, should be done.
That's why everyone gets confused.
If one thing is left out, then abandoning the scriptures, one's own mind creates a Maharaj like this.
So, one should pay attention to everything.
So, how vast is the personality of God!
If we measure him and fit him according to our decision, saying he is like this and like that.
Then we should try to fit it as described in the scriptures.
Maharaj has written so many beautiful shlokas in it.
It starts from the very first shloka.
If you want to make a decision, do it this way.
Among these, the statements that are supremely excellent regarding Shri Krishna and Vrisha, and also regarding devotion and detachment, are to be considered primary. Other statements are secondary. Devotion to Krishna, accompanied by dharma, should be performed.
Maharaj has given an angle.
It's not like you put it according to that angle and then, according to your own mind, think, 'If it's like this, it'll be like that, and if it's like that, it'll be like this, and if it's like that, it'll be like that.'
Maharaj has already said everything.
In those few shlokas, Maharaj has given the key to the entire scripture.
So, if it's like this, what to do, and if it's like that, what to do? It's said there that if it's like this, do this, and if it's like that, do that.
Therefore, in the forms, there is no difference whatsoever.
God has given the key to how to make a decision about God.
Here, if one has studied Sanskrit and puts a little life into it and reads the shlokas, everything is clear.
That if he is with Arjuna, it's this, and if he is with this one, it's this, and if he is with this one, it's this.
And sometimes those devotees, out of love, become merged within the form of God.
So, do not perceive any difference in that.
His devotion should always be performed by the divine sages on earth.
Only his devotion should be performed.
Maharaj has said so much in that.
Here, God is referred to as two-armed.
Therefore, it should be understood that in Akshardham, Lord Shri Hari is always two-armed.
Of the two-armed one, and his will.
So, the original four-armed form, the karma vibhakti (case ending) is used there.
Dvibaho (two-armed) is in the genitive case, meaning 'of the doer'.
Dvibaho tasya chaishikam (two-armed is his choice).
So, the original is two-armed, and the four-armed form is his choice.
That is his wish, and his wish is to fulfill the devotee's desires.
Here, in the Shikshapatri, Maharaj used the word 'swarup' (form), saying 'atasya swarupeshu' (in his forms).
Atasya swarupeshu (in his forms).
No difference, and completely.
There is no difference in the forms of God.
And in the Vachanamrut, Maharaj said that there is a difference in the avatars.
So, how do we understand that there is no difference between avatars and swarup?
What is said here is about a single avatar, described from different angles.
And what Maharaj said there is that he compared all the different avatars.
Here, Maharaj has imagined different angles within one avatar.
That the same Krishna is with Radha, the same Krishna is with Rukmini, the same Krishna is with Arjuna, and the same Krishna is with that one.
That same Krishna gave darshan to Muchukunda in a four-armed form, and to Arjuna in a thousand-armed form.
He showed the universe to Yashoda, and to this one.
So it's the same thing, and that's not about one and the same avatar; here, it's about one avatar.
If in one avatar all these forms of God are shown, then how can the form of Lord Shri Krishna be called different?
And Maharaj has said in the Vachanamrut that all avatars are not the same; there is no talk of a single avatar there.
There, he talked about different avatars, like Matsya, Kurma, Narasimha, Vamana, Rama, Krishna; he talked about different avatars.
And here, he has not talked about different avatars.
It seems that the Shikshapatri talks about the forms of the eternal God.
So, the forms that are in those avatars are also considered to be of the eternal God.
Maharaj spoke about the eternal form up to the point that Shri Krishna, the Supreme Brahman, Lord Purushottam, is the cause of all the worshipped deities.
Now, when Maharaj later spoke, he said, 'Gneyo Arjuna yukto sau Narnarayanabhidha' (Arjuna, know that Nar-Narayan is united).
If Radha is there with him, then how can the talk of the supreme form come with Radhaji?
If Arjuna and all are there, then how can the supreme form be there? So, Maharaj came into the state of avatar.
From that verse, he then came into the state of avatar.
The worship of the supreme form does not happen directly without the worship of the avatar.
The worship of the supreme form, no one can do it directly without the worship of the avatar state, the avatar.
So, one needs to hold onto some avatar.
Nowadays, everyone has helicopters and planes, so they can land directly here on their way.
Otherwise, one has to take at least one path, right?
So, even then, the plane's routes must be fixed.
So, even if it's like that, the paths are fixed; he has to take a path.
So, if they worship the supreme form in Satya Yuga, that's fine.
In connection with this age, after Vyas Bhagwan was there, then.
The connection with the supreme form cannot happen without the connection with the avatar.
So Maharaj first said that he is the supreme deity.
Yet, Maharaj has removed all of them from the Siddhant (doctrine).
Maharaj, while performing Puranic worship.
Siddhi Upanishad worship, and Upanishad worship means the worship of the two lotus feet, one God.
There, neither Radha, nor Lakshmi, nor Arjuna, nor anyone else is with him.
The solitary God is the worship of the two-armed God.
Such is the tradition of the Upanishads.
We talked about how, as the dullness of intellect increased, Vyas Bhagwan made arrangements for everyone.
Yet, that arrangement is not wrong at all.
That arrangement is not wrong at all. Maharaj has not called it wrong.
Because the worship of the supreme form is done through the medium of the avatar, the contemplation of the supreme form cannot be done without keeping it in the avatar.
Without making the avatar a medium, no one can directly worship the supreme form.
So Maharaj, after speaking of the supreme form, immediately came into the state of avatar.
So, which avatar to select became his own preference.
So Maharaj showed more inclination towards Shri Krishna Bhagwan among all avatars.
He showed more because among all other avatars, he is the best.
If one compares all other avatars by keeping Maharaj aside, Maharaj said that Vyas Bhagwan has said it.
That all avatars do that.
So, to worship the supreme avatar through the medium of Shri Krishna Bhagwan's avatar.
That is better than through the medium of other avatars.
Maharaj says that if you study this deeply, that is the meaning.
So what Maharaj has said is that Radha and Lakshmi are just a part of Shri Krishna Bhagwan's life.
In other avatars, he wouldn't even mention Sita's name, saying that when Sita is there, it's called Sitaram. Maharaj wouldn't have said that.
And if he wanted to, Maharaj would say that it is 'ataschasyam' because Maharaj says that 'ataschasyam swaroop swaroope bhedo gey na sarvatha'.
So if Sita had been taken, then here we would have been called Lakshmi Nrusimha.
When Narsinh Bhagwan came, he came alone.
But these people brought Lakshmiji along with them.
And Hayagriva, these Vedant Deshik are devotees of Hayagriva Bhagwan.
So he also brings Lakshmiji along with Hayagriva.
So he brings Lakshmiji in all avatars.
And if Maharaj had said that 'ataschasyam swaroope swa bhedo gey no sarvatha' then it's not like that.
You all have studied deeply, so this much.
That what Maharaj has talked about here.
He has talked about one avatar state.
Of Krishna avatar.
And why did he talk about Krishna avatar and not about the supreme avatar?
So, without the medium of the avatar, the worship of the supreme avatar does not happen.
One has to make any avatar a medium.
So then there were many other avatars, so why didn't he take them?
So he didn't take them because through the medium of this avatar, one can quickly reach the supreme form.
Because this avatar is greater than others, as Vyas Bhagwan has said.
For us, through the medium of Maharaj, there is not much difference between the supreme and the lower in Maharaj's medium.
Because here in the charitras, Maharaj has shown that all avatars emerge from him, just like big rivers like the Nile emerge from a large Victoria lake.
Similarly, all avatars emerge from and merge into the form of God.
Maharaj did that here on Earth.
It should be done there.
Sitting in Akshardham.
But Maharaj showed it on Earth.
So for us, there isn't much difference between the supreme and the lower.
It gets attached here.
Even then, this is the main thing; by clinging to this, that contemplation happens.
It doesn't directly attach there.
So, without grasping the avatar state in the avatar state, the contemplation of the supreme cannot happen.
Here, Maharaj contemplates the avatar state.
And Maharaj said that because he contemplated the Shri Krishna avatar.
Maharaj didn't say that when we are in Panchala, we are different, and when we are in Gadhada, we are different, and you will know such non-difference, and we are one.
If he says that, who would believe him?
Maharaj has come to make other jivas do satsang.
Maharaj didn't just bring it from Akshardham because he didn't have time there, so he sat here and we did a shibir, and then we take it to a place and do it there.
Maharaj didn't come to do such things.
First, Maharaj's entire life, Maharaj, sitting in Akshardham, started his journey to come here.
And what all did he do after coming here?
And then he left.
So, what work did he do throughout his life and why did he do it?
Why did he make all these plans and all these means?
If there is contemplation of that, then the contemplation of each and every word of Maharaj can come.
Whole
Without bringing that angle, if one makes small small things from different perspectives, then that angle won't come.
Here, God is called two-armed, so it should be understood that in Akshardham, Lord Shri Hari is always two-armed.
What Maharaj said here, 'tasyasya swaroopeshu vedo gayan sarvatha' (the Vedas sing about his forms in every way), in what context was that said?
During the life of Shri Krishna Bhagwan, he gave so many darshans, so one should not categorize them.
Similarly, one should not do so for every avatar.
For us, it is for Maharaj; if we categorize for Maharaj, then we should not make such categories.
We don't make any categories.
But all these people who make categories, among them, even among the followers of Shri Krishna, it is said that one should worship until 11 years and 52 days, and not after that.
Then there was no object of worship left.
There are such beliefs within it, inner beliefs.
That we are already people with such beliefs, right?
That Maharaj could not do this work.
So, since he couldn't do it, he is not worthy of worship.
Maharaj wanted to do this, but couldn't. Maharaj wanted to establish one form of Maharaj, and didn't want to establish any other dual forms, but Maharaj was forced to establish them.
And he couldn't propagate his worship. Now we have come from there, so we have come to propagate it.
So.
There are those who believe that in Maharaj.
So, don't believe too much in that.
Whatever Maharaj has done, one should learn to understand it properly by straightening it out.
One should not learn to understand it by twisting it.
And maintain Maharaj's supremacy.
And then, turning it around, Maharaj
If they devalue it, it still cannot be said that they understood it.
And if they devalue someone else's, they still haven't understood it.
Yesterday we had a question, right, that some people believe Zina Bhai is Shri Krishna Bhagwan.
He was an avatar.
And Laduba and her were avatars of Lakshmiji.
So, do the devotees of Shri Krishna Bhagwan fit into that?
There was that one suba who used to disrespect Maharaj.
He used to name his dog Sahajanand and his bull something else, so does that disrespect Maharaj, or does that fit you?
So, if you tell someone that their avatar or their revered deity is like this, then it fits them.
If you still call Jivuba an avatar of Lakshmiji, it fits because that is considered a devotee's imagination of a devotee.
Of a devotee by a devotee.
Okay, if Sitaji was an avatar of Lakshmiji, then Rukminiji could be.
Because the avatars might have changed.
But if we devalue someone's Ishtadev like this and do this, how much does that fit?
And how does it fit in our hearts?
From Maharaj's perspective, how much does it fit?
So, when we compare avatars with devotees, we should be a little careful.
How much does it fit from the outside world, how much does it fit in the scriptures, how much does it fit in our hearts.
So, one should pay a little attention to that.
So, such an imagination should not be made, even if it exists, it should not be made.
And such a thing should be said that its valuation increases and our Maharaj's valuation also increases.
Its valuation increases, and by increasing its valuation, our Maharaj's valuation indirectly increases.
That should be done.
And if one categorizes, nothing happens.
Nothing happens until one categorizes.
So, it doesn't happen by breaking things too much.
One should find some such trick from the scriptures that when his glory increases, Maharaj's multiplies.
Maharaj's should multiply in that, that's what should be done.
And such understanding should be sought from the scriptures.
In the scriptures, all understanding has been given, even of destruction.
So, if there is a test of inclination, then one who has to break things will directly take the crowbar in hand.
What is to be done?
He would put his hand there, but Maharaj did not put his hand in the crowbar for destruction.
Maharaj had put his hand on the book.
Here, God is called two-armed, meaning that in Akshardham, Lord Shri Hari is always two-armed, so understand it that way.
It is said in the Vasudeva Mahatmya, which is in the Vishnu Khanda of the Skanda Purana, that whose form is extremely peaceful and therefore worthy of darshan, who is beyond kshar and akshar and independent, who can create, sustain, and dissolve many universes by a mere hint from the corner of his eye.
The supreme fragrant sandalwood is smeared on his form, and the mark of Shri Vatsa is embossed on his chest.
Narada Muni, after having darshan of such Shri Krishna, who was playing the flute with both his soft, lotus-like hands, holding it to his lips and playing it with a sweet melody, became immersed in the ocean of happiness.
Since it is said in the above shloka that he has two hands, it proves that Shri Hari in Akshardham is two-armed.
And
So all these weapons and everything, then they go into the avatar section, like someone playing a flute, someone with a bow.
Tulsidasji has praised Lord Rama like that.
So, it is said 'Chapdhar' (one who holds a bow).
So that, then the avatar anushandhan (research/connection) comes.
That is called avatar anushandhan.
Maharaj has not kept much of that.
So Maharaj's worship of the original form, wearing Maharaj's weapons, that's where most of the anushandhan (connection/research) comes from.
Which the Upanishads have described.
So where does the flute not appear in the Upanishads?
In the Upanishads, neither a flute nor a bow appears anywhere.
Even a rosary doesn't appear.
Like that.
So, the form of Maharaj, all that Maharaj has propagated, directly relates to the Upanishads. The original connection comes from there.
And yet, Maharaj has given respect to all these avatar upasana (worship of incarnations), and that is his greatness.
In that, the glory of Maharaj, as much as we know the glory of this, the glory of Maharaj multiplies.
Like that.
And therefore, in the next verse, the Lord himself says, "O Brahman, in this Akshardham, I am Vasudeva, who resides with Purushottam, Radha, Lakshmi, and his dependent associates like Nanda and Sunanda, and who, as the indweller of all beings, independently bestows the fruits of everyone's actions."
Furthermore, in the vast and great Vaikunthadham,
All these associates
weapons
If there is a description of God
That is what is called acceptable to God.
To catch it, like that.
Hey
To become graspable
To grasp God
It is for grasping.
But Gunatitanand Swami said, "The village of Gokul is a unique lump."
It doesn't come under this; it's just a means to get there, that's all.
All these are like the 'branch and moon' analogy.
The moon is visible on this neem branch.
But now, the moon and the neem branch are millions of miles apart.
Similarly, through all these means, one must grasp the original form; the original form doesn't care about any of these.
It's not that if there's a flute, it's called the original form, and
If there is a Sarang bow, it is called the original form; the original form is not based on that.
But to grasp what the original form is, all these are necessary.
God is grasped through some medium; without a medium, God cannot be grasped, that's why.
That's why they are all for the support of our intellect.
By doing anushandhan (meditation/contemplation) on what the original form is, as Maharaj said, and then worshipping God in this avatar state.
Keep that anushandhan (meditation/contemplation).
So Shastriji Maharaj used to say that 'that is this' and 'this is that'.
To maintain such anushandhan (meditation/contemplation) is called nishchay (firm conviction).
If that hasn't happened yet, Maharaj says his nishchay (conviction) is raw.
Maharaj said in the fourth Vachanamrut of Panchala
That there is one supreme form of God and one form of God here.
And one who knows the supreme form well and the form here well
When one knows both and unites them, then one is said to have firm conviction.
And if one only knows the glory of this and does not have the connection with the supreme form, then the conviction is weak.
And if one knows the glory of the abode very well, but has not established anything here, then one's conviction is weak.
So, one should maintain the connection with both properly.
One worships here and maintains the connection with the other.
Then his conviction is firm.
And it should be remembered from time to time.
When God performs human pastimes, then one should remember that these are those.
Then he gets firm conviction.
Always remember.
Huh?
If there is any divine play, story, or anything else, then the mind's inclination is to remember that.
There is no need to do it all the time, but when Lord Krishna was performing human pastimes and Parikshit had a doubt, Shukdevji remembered that when he performs human pastimes, then there is a need to connect with that, otherwise if our mind remains in God, then there is no problem, but when he performs human pastimes, if the mind runs away, then one has to connect with that.
When do we know if we have proper devotion or not?
When there is a camp, a gathering, and all the discourses are happening, then one knows about devotion.
Then one doesn't know about devotion. One knows about devotion when the time comes.
How does one know about God's supreme connection and this world's connection?
God performs some such divine play by performing human pastimes, like a magic trick.
Then he realizes that, oh, this is God.
So, Uddhavji had such a connection.
When Lord Krishna went to Kubja's house, he did not change.
Shukdevji had such a connection.
The Gopis themselves had such a connection.
That he may perform any actions.
But he is a different kind of being.
So, he had such a connection.
So, he did not have a worldly connection.
So, he is said to have firm conviction.
And if there is no firm conviction, and sometimes it happens like this and sometimes it happens like that, then it is not called firm conviction.
There was a question.
Is this connection only for Maharaj's form, or is it also for other incarnations?
Other incarnations can also do it because they are all worshipping the same God.
Why?
Those incarnations are not all complete.
So, in that incarnation, many incarnations have other incarnations.
Is there any place for that?
What is that?
That is supreme.
If one is a devotee of Lord Ramchandra, then where does that go?
Goes to Vaikunth.
In the supreme form.
Doesn't it go to the supreme form? Where does it go?
If one is the lord of Vaikunth, then one goes to Vaikunth.
If it is Lord Narnarayan, then where does that form go?
So, where is the difference in the original form of God?
Huh?
How did differences arise in the original form?
It became a medium.
What is called a difference?
If it has a complete disconnection.
If it has a disconnection.
If we are coming from Mumbai to Hyderabad and stop at Gulbarga in between.
So, it got disconnected.
It became a medium.
Then what about how much we come down there?
Sometimes, don't give it here.
If it has already come there properly.
There, we would have got all the facilities.
Then we won't even reach here.
So, that is the question.
Where is the disconnection?
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Hmm.
Furthermore, in the vast and great Vaikunthadham, I reside in the form of Chaturbhuj with Lakshmiji, Nanda, and other chief attendants like Garuda.
It is said that in the upper Vaikuntha Loka, I reside in the form of Chaturbhuj, therefore the two-armed form of Purushottam residing in Akshardham is proven.
Why do we think that God's form does not fit our resolutions?
How would God be thinking?
To keep all these equal.
How to keep them equal? How to make everyone equal? If one thinks from that perspective, then it works.
Like that.
Suppose there is a company like Walmart. Now, if a watchman of that store thinks, "How does its owner think?"
If one understands how the owner thinks, then everyone gets equal justice.
Would it be like this? Would it be like that?
If that watchman keeps shouting, how will it work?
Think from his perspective. Determination is made by tattva. What does it mean by tattva?
In the 63rd Vachanamrut of the first chapter, it is said that God's determination is made by knowing Him in this way.
What is the meaning of the word 'tattva'? What is its etymology?
Bhava.
Tasya bhavah tattvam.
Tasya kasya?
Harsya.
Anadi.
And why not now, bhava?
What is the meaning of bhava?
Yatharth.
Huh?
Yatharth.
If his thinking and his reality are there, and we have made a determination according to that, then it is said that the determination in our heart is made by tattva. If we keep him in our framework and then make a determination by tattva, then how did it happen by tattva? It happened by ahamtva, the word 'tat' and the word 'aham'.
The word 'tat' and it is like this.
If we have made a determination according to our own arrangement,
then how will it last? If someone slaps it properly, everything will scatter.
And the determination by tattva, how does he think? And how does he manage the entire infinite universes and all the avatars?
And if we believe and make a determination according to that, then it will not waver.
Even if we look at other avatars, we won't know, and there won't be any wavering.
What is called determination by tattva?
His intellect, what does he think in his intellect?
Who?
Maharaj.
What does Maharaj think in his intellect?
And the form that is in the supreme abode, what has he done knowing everything?
And what did he know to come here?
Even if one thinks about that, one's determination is made.
We all sit here and decide that Narendra Modi doesn't know this much and he made a mistake, and Amit Shah doesn't know anything.
We know everything.
So, it's all like this.
In the matter of determination, everyone grinds their own grain, their own alphabet.
Nobody asks Maharaj.
Nobody asks this Shikshapatri.
What is said in the Shikshapatri?
And they don't even sit to think about it with their soul.
That, come on, in this form, there is no difference at all, so what is this?
What did Maharaj say in that?
There is nothing like that.
Those verses, which are about Shri Krishna and Shiva, are of supreme excellence, as are devotion and detachment.
What was said in that, nobody wants to bother their mind with it.
After hearing that, they still grind their own grain.
They search after hearing that.
My alphabet didn't come in the Shikshapatri.
He just took the standard alphabet directly.
He didn't take my home alphabet.
It's like this everywhere.
Furthermore, it can also be clearly understood in the Samhita.
For example, when Lord Vishnu went to Shvetadvipa in the Shri Krishna Janma Khanda of the Brahma Vaivarta Purana, His pure form became divided into two parts.
Of those two, the right-hand part became two-armed.
He was holding the form of a child like Gopal.
He was adorned with dark blue and yellow garments, like a fresh cloud.
He had a flute on his mouth.
His face was exceedingly beautiful and filled with a gentle smile.
His eyes were like lotuses.
He was an extremely radiant Brahman form.
He was devoid of the three gunas of Maya.
That all-pervading form of the Supreme Soul was a form of grace upon the devotees.
That Sarveshwar, the Lord of Goloka, was the husband of Radhikaji.
That very Mahaprabhu resides in Vaikuntha Loka in His four-armed form as the husband of Mahalakshmi.
Victory to Sahajanand Swami Maharaj.